We've been saying it for years, now the research supports us:cool:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/education/4183166.stm

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/education/4079653.stm

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/education/4079653.stm
THat article wasn't based on scientific research:p :cool:

That article wasn't based on scientific research:p :cool:
Maybe not, it did appear based on what management THOUGHT however, which is means promotions and advancment regardless of what the scientists say. Besides, one thing I have learned, scientists pretty much suck. Oh they do OK if it is something you can touch and feel, but their much worse at stuff you can't touch and feel like spirits, or the universe, or even our own planets than say Bush finding Osama. Shoot, in 50 years they may "prove" dolphins are smarter than people (they can't be today cause scientists can't "talk" to them).
I don't always give the scientists too much credit.

THat article wasn't based on scientific research:p :cool:

It's just as scientific as the one you quoted. :cool: :D

It's just as scientific as the one you quoted. :cool: :D
No it isn't, yours is based on suspect figures designed to fool the bingo brigade here:p :cool:
THey are nothing more than spin to make our great and glorious idiot look good:mad:

Women are much better at taking what they know an applying it to a situation.

Example: Every transgression real or imagined a husband has every committed against his wife is instantly at the female's fingertips during an arguement. The husband has to take a time out and go look up his wife's transgressions.

Just to P.O. my wife, I used to do that. One day the notebook was missing.
SEE, they're smarter.

SEE, they're smarter.
Nah it's just that a part of their anatomy is akin to that of an elephant:cool: :D

Nah it's just that a part of their anatomy is akin to that of an elephant:cool: :D

Which part? :eek: :cool:

Which part? :eek: :cool:
Just the brain:p :cool:

We've been saying it for years, now the research supports us:cool:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/education/4183166.stm

Thats about the best post I've ever seen you do :eek: :eek:
:p

Thats about the best post I've ever seen you do :eek: :eek:
:p
Then you need to spend less time fooling aroundy and read some more of my posts:p :cool:

Maybe not, it did appear based on what management THOUGHT however, which is means promotions and advancment regardless of what the scientists say. Besides, one thing I have learned, scientists pretty much suck. Oh they do OK if it is something you can touch and feel, but their much worse at stuff you can't touch and feel like spirits, or the universe, or even our own planets than say Bush finding Osama. Shoot, in 50 years they may "prove" dolphins are smarter than people (they can't be today cause scientists can't "talk" to them).
I don't always give the scientists too much credit.

Perhaps you don't understand "science" or what "scientists" do. (Those are absurdly general and inclusive terms, by the way).

I thought this was a 'destroy the post above' thread at first. God fun. :)

Perhaps you don't understand "science" or what "scientists" do. (Those are absurdly general and inclusive terms, by the way).
Sure I do, but what a lot people don't think about is that most have a limited outlook, and if you go back an notice they
1 - keep changing the rules (so who is to say the rules used today are valid).
2 - a lot of the major discoveries were caused by some kind of accident or wrong move or how ever you want to say it, not by the scope they were following.
3 - Some of the newer things they are "discovering" come from old/ancient discoveries that someone already knew about (sure it might be some native tribe somewhere), but man knew about it.
4 - Most are driven by money.
5 - A lot is driven by the military.

You can't stereo type all into that, don't get me wrong, but you have many developing new diasases, but fewer trying to cure the ones we have. And the ones we have they are trying to cure, are the more "popular" ones where there is money involved. No, I don't give the scientist much more credit than politicens.

Watching Tricia all day doesn't help!