View Full Version : Hiding fields with data
jake7363 05-09-2007, 05:30 AM Hi,
I have a report that has three fields that could each have a the same customer name in, based on a query that asks for the customer name.
If, for example, two of the fields show the selected customer, is it possible to hide the third field that has a different customer name in?
If it is possible, how would I go about it?
Thanks in advance,
Jake
GaryPanic 05-09-2007, 06:28 AM you need to expand on this
if field 1 and field 2 are equal then field 3 is visible/not visble
if you cna logic this then it can be done
so give us your field names and some bright spark will give you the coding for the report .
g
GaryPanic 05-09-2007, 06:32 AM on your report properites
have
if x=y then z.visble =false
else
z.visble= true
now you may have to play with this
the x and the y will be field on your report (and may not be the same as your qry)
and you may have to use !
so if me!reportfieldname =me!reportfieldname then me!reportfieldname3 visble = false
else reportfieldname3= true
end if
GaryPanic 05-09-2007, 06:33 AM oops last line out reportfiledname3.visble= true
now this will only work if field 1 and 2 are excaty the same - and i mean excatly the same,
jake7363 05-09-2007, 06:47 AM To ask a bit further, since there is no predictability as to which field will contain the name based on the Select query, would this logic still apply?
If I am asking to show which records contain "John Doe" in any one of the three fields, or all of them, I only want to show the fields that contain John Doe. That might be 1, 2 or 3, or any combo thereof.
Thanks again..
GaryPanic 05-09-2007, 08:33 AM hummm.
a real thinker this one- I'll have athink and come back onthis ...
tehNellie 05-09-2007, 08:44 AM You can expand Gary's intial IF to cover all possbilities. I'm assuming that the name isn't known before hand, otherwise simply include it, as a parameter if necessary in your select statement and be done with it.
in psuedo code you're looking at doing something along the lines of
If (field1 = Field2) and (field1 <> Field3) then
Field3.visible = false
elseif (field1 <> Field2) and (field1 = field3) Then
field2.visible = false
elseif (field2 <> field1) and (Field2 = field3) then
Field1.visible = false
endif
If all three fields are different, or the same, then all fields will be visible.
GaryPanic 05-09-2007, 08:47 AM well done
after 2 if's i lose the will to live and my train of thought....
still not too sure this will work - but damn sight better than I could of done .
g
tehNellie 05-09-2007, 08:48 AM I'd be a liar if I said I'd tested it exhaustively and I'm sure I've probably missed something, but a little "widget" that I used to test it seems to come up with the right results:
Dim Field1 As String, field2 As String, field3 As String
Field1 = InputBox("enter a value for field1")
field2 = InputBox("enter a value for field2")
field3 = InputBox("enter a value for field3")
If (Field1 = field2) And (Field1 <> field3) Then
MsgBox ("field3.Visible = False")
ElseIf (Field1 <> field2) And (Field1 = field3) Then
MsgBox ("field2.Visible = False")
ElseIf (field2 <> Field1) And (field2 = field3) Then
MsgBox ("Field1.Visible = False")
Else
MsgBox ("they're all the same/different")
End If
Why would you have THREE fields all with the same name in?:confused:
jake7363 05-09-2007, 09:47 AM If I would use a custom dialag box, I could test against the data in the dialog box to match against the fields, then...?
boblarson 05-09-2007, 10:41 AM Why would you have THREE fields all with the same name in?:confused:
That question is eating at me too...
tehNellie 05-09-2007, 10:45 AM Me too, I just got sidetracked on doing the hiding thing.
jake7363 05-09-2007, 10:50 AM OK, to answer honestly, it was not my idea. The issue is that those instances where a customar makes three purchases at different times, in one P.O. The "person" in charge wants all transactions of all instances under one heading of the PO number.
I inherited this mess, and am trying to avoid rewriting the whole thing with separate tables..but I may have to.
|