ions
10-20-2008, 08:06 AM
Dear MS Access Expert.
I currently have a split database. The backend on Server 1 and the frontends on each workstation.
I am now in need of introducing a new machine into the above organizational scheme. I will call this Server 2.
Server 2 will be continously updating a MS Access table (call it Table Q) every 5 minutes.
I need the frontend workstations to have access to table Q on Server 2.
Should I organize the new infrastrucutre using option A or option B.
Option A: Link Server 1 to Server 2 Table Q. Link Front End to Server 1 Table Q.
Option B. Link Front End directly to Server 2 Table Q.
What do you recommend? Option A is more effecient from an administrative point of view because all links will be updated from one source (I update links often because I do development remotely). Option B is probably easier for the MS Access engine to understand.
Thanks for your feedback.
I currently have a split database. The backend on Server 1 and the frontends on each workstation.
I am now in need of introducing a new machine into the above organizational scheme. I will call this Server 2.
Server 2 will be continously updating a MS Access table (call it Table Q) every 5 minutes.
I need the frontend workstations to have access to table Q on Server 2.
Should I organize the new infrastrucutre using option A or option B.
Option A: Link Server 1 to Server 2 Table Q. Link Front End to Server 1 Table Q.
Option B. Link Front End directly to Server 2 Table Q.
What do you recommend? Option A is more effecient from an administrative point of view because all links will be updated from one source (I update links often because I do development remotely). Option B is probably easier for the MS Access engine to understand.
Thanks for your feedback.