Brianwarnock
Retired
- Local time
- Today, 15:19
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2003
- Messages
- 12,701
jsanders said:It's Col and I went to the pub.
.
WOW!! Does that mean you've kissed and made up.
Brian
jsanders said:It's Col and I went to the pub.
.
Brianwarnock said:WOW!! Does that mean you've kissed and made up.
Brian
Rich said:I thought you'd given up the drink, read what I said again
Brianwarnock said:I've done some research and tho' I can't point to a particular reference as I read a few it would appear that Ken and I are guilty of hypercorrection, and that it is..... like you and me. Like is a preposition apparently in this use and the pronoun is always an object not a subject after a preposition.
Brian
Perhaps you should and then try reading what I said againjsanders said:That was nearly 18 years ago. I no longer even think about it.
One could always go to the bog and get a free drink out of the tapBrianwarnock said:Congratulations Joe, but we do sell nonalcoholic drinks in our pubs, they just cost an arm and a leg.
Brian
Rich said:No, just start by banning brainwashing in schools
anyway I thought you were going to bugger off for the day a couple of hours ago?
Brianwarnock said:I've done some research and tho' I can't point to a particular reference as I read a few it would appear that Ken and I are guilty of hypercorrection, and that it is..... like you and me. Like is a preposition apparently in this use and the pronoun is always an object not a subject after a preposition.
Brian
jsanders said:Going back to the original theme.
I was actually less interested in the variations in people’s beliefs but as to where it would lead.
It seams to me that the planet is squaring off on all issues and absolute fanaticism is running rampant.
More and more the society of acceptance seams to be breading “I’m right you’re wrong and, well, maybe it’s time you died for being wrong”.
This problem doesn’t seem to be limited to any particular group, but kind of a general consensus. Lets all disagree as vehemently as possible.
BarryMK said:It may be of course that none of the evangelicals on this thread saw the questions I posed earlier and so the benefit of the doubt should be given, but the cynic in me finds it interesting that so far not one has responded.......
BarryMK said:I wonder how many of the people here espousing religion can truthfully say that they formed their beliefs of their own free will, at an age when they were (one would hope) able to think for themselves, as opposed to having been indoctrinated from the cradle by parents/family peers/local church/synagogue/mosque/wicca/witchdoctor and so on?
I am one of those folks who's life was in partying, drug, drinking and did not care too much about God and anything He could have done for me, but when I was around 20 years old, I had someone take the time to introduce me to the God of the Bible and now I am one of those simple minded, can't reason for myself, blind christians. What I do know is that my life is not the same and that I would not trade it for anything anyone else could offer me. I believe that many things stated here are misrepresented but I'm not going to spent time debating them because in the end it really doesn't accomplish anything. Hope this makes at least some sense to you.
BarryMK said:Also how many had alighted on a specific religion after critically examining all the alternatives as opposed to blindly following the example set by family etc?
You think this is a new thing?jsanders said:“I’m right you’re wrong and, well, maybe it’s time you died for being wrong”.
Adeptus said:And how many wars have been fought over "I'm right you're wrong"? (religious or otherwise)
makes a changeKenHigg said:I didn't mean anything personal.
I am - in the morningsKenHigg said:Why can't you be more like this all the time?
I mentioned it because [to the outside world] it appeared that New Orleans was left to fend for itself because it was on "home soil".jsanders said:We were “willing” to come to the aid of Louisiana, but the idiot and his programs demoralized FEMA
And of course it was their own fault for living there in the first place and secondly for not leaving when they were told to. The fact that they were abandoned with no means of transport is irrelevantColinEssex said:I mentioned it because [to the outside world] it appeared that New Orleans was left to fend for itself because it was on "home soil".
The main thing is that the USA does act quickly and many hundreds of people who would have died were saved by the quick response.
Col
ShaneMan said:I would admit that I skimmed it but really didn't notice the question being asked so now that you have brought it to my/our attention, then I will answer them as good as I can. I sort of answered at least part of your first question in another post below:.