Recent content by moke123

neither

at least once. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-68490662

Except in Conneticut ;)

the same plan discussed last time you mentioned "secretly flying in illegals" https://www.americanimmigrationcouncil.org/research/biden-administration%E2%80%99s-humanitarian-parole-program-cubans-haitians-nicaraguans-and...

Read the plan.

You should maybe read the plan Pat. We don't pay a dime, IIRC.

I'm hybrid. I'll declare them where needed while writing the code, and then move them to top when the code works and I'm tidying it up.

Your preaching to the choir, Pat. I testified in a case last week and the jury came back in under 6 minutes with not guilty all counts. Even the police chief and his patrol officer who investigated it when it happened said it didn't happen. Believe it or not, they are the entire town police...

oldest trick in the book.

Must be doing something right.

Nah, it's fox. They've already admitted they lie to their audience. He probably doesn't even believe the nonsense he spouts.

No it's not, besides it being a 9 month old video.

I get a dictionary of the dates to exclude and then when looping through the controls do a test to see if the date is in the dictionary and disable the control if true.

Actually it was the judge. He allowed improper testimony. It's not uncommon.

Procedural errors happen all the time. All he won was a new trial, not an acquittal. He'll likely be re-tried.