Search results

Looks like I have only limited access. It said after a short period that I have used up my allowance for GPT4o.

I'm not sure how good they are but I noticed a big improvement from the Oculus Go to the Oculus Quest 3. It is now usable.

Just checked and I need to press the headphones icon. I got it too!

Do you mean you have the very latest version where the female voice picks up on your own emotional intonation and responds accordingly? Edit: I see access to the o version is only for paid users so far.

I totally get the doctor thing. There always seem to be other things that are more important than a niggle. Get to it when it gets really bad. WIth this VR stuff, perhaps it's a bit like marmite. As seen in previous discussions in this thread, OP bought and returned, whilst both you and I still...

You mean it fixed your shoulder? Loosened it up? The translation from VR to real world has gotta be a thing. Some people dispute this with the table tennis game, but what you are doing is building up a) rapid decision making given a certain situation, b) skill muscle memory, c) fitness. For...

Welcome to Access World! We're so happy to have you join us as a member of our community. As the most active Microsoft Access discussion forum on the internet, with posts dating back more than 20 years, we have a wealth of knowledge and experience to share with you. We're a friendly and helpful...

I've stopped in the last month. My poor cat was dying and everything went out the window. I will start up again soon, spending up to 1 hour per day again. The 1hr 40m per day I was doing for about 3 months, 7 days per week is a big commitment and I only did that to make some rapid initial...

It's spam from one of the usual countries.

I checked the time you posted your new thread here and the time of the last post (prior to that time) in the thread you replied to. I am 100% sure that is the post you replied to and therefore it was a link issue.

I bet you quoted Post #26. Correct? If so, you quoted a post with a link in it. Therefore, the text that was in the Reply box had a link and so was rejected.

I'm trying to establish the content that was in the quoted text, not @davegoodo's text.

Which post number did you quote in your reply on that thread? You said you quoted another member.

What was the name of the thread where you got your first spam error?

That is not the thread the OP was originally trying to post to, where they got the error in the first instance. I need that thread.

I have an idea of what it might be. Can you give me a link to the thread in question and which post you quoted in your reply? The My Final Post.txt file you posted does not have the text of the quote. Consequently, the quoted text might have a link in it.

I think, on reflection, that no links under 100 probably includes internal links too. My guess is the software is not sophisticated enough to check between internal and external links.

I do not know what was in the post. From message #2, it seems that @davegoodo tried to post a link again. No links allowed under 100 posts.

To be honest, I do not know if internal links are included or not. Nothing in the backend mentions any distinction. The only way to find out would be to do a test.

No, but I am considering removing profile links altogether. It is another type of spam that you can't check for unless you do it manually. So, lots of spammers go under the radar. Sometimes you have to throw the baby out with the bathwater, regretfully.