Dear pbaldy...it worked exactly as you suggested & by struggling & studying this I managed to bring all three conditions combined into one field.
Here it is:
cn: IIf([lname1]=[lname2],[fname1] & " & " & [fname2] & " " & [lname1],IIf([fname1]+[lname1],[fname1] & " " &...
hey dcrake-
Yes these requests & diversity in naming can get quite complex. Your answer looks like an artform!! It will take me a couple of days to work through this & test. Thank-you very much & I will be in touch soon.
-many thanks!
o' dear pbaldy! I am completely lost.
CN: IIf([lname1]=[lname2],[fname1] & (" & "+[fname2] & " " & [lname1]& ("& "+[fname1]+" "+[lname1]+" "+[fname2]+" "+[lname2]))
but now it ignores the fname1 & lname1 (leaves it blank)
and then this: anna & doug smith anna smith & doug smith in the same...
So Paul-
ok, nothing like end user requests! In addition to the concatenation tips you helped me with above...how would you consider this:
My end users want this: if Lname1=lname2, then concatenate fname1 & fname2 with lname1 (so bill smith & diane smith will become Bill & Diane smith)
Can...
Dear PBaldy-
It works like a CHARM! So simple...so elegant & so SUBTLE a change with big results! Thank-you also for your remarks about syntax...syntax is more persnickety than grammar and it is igniting my curiosity. -many thanks
Hi everyone. I look forward to helping when I can & being helped as I stretch my skills into some SQL/VBA programming.
so riddle me this:
The idea here is to create labels that concatenate Person1 & Person2 appropriately and simultaneously accommodate records where there is only Person1...