Democrats: Break America to Re-Make America (1 Viewer)

conception_native_0123

Well-known member
Local time
Yesterday, 21:02
Joined
Mar 13, 2021
Messages
1,826
A country is supposed to look after its citizens first and foremost.
then how do you explain the rationale for NOT taking advantage of business globalization? that makes no sense. ask richard for one thing. globalization was inevitable.

Fair warning - if you continue to make racist remarks, I will censure you. #19 is your last racist comment. You clearly intend them as such or you would not persist.
LOL. I just got my laugh for the day. thanks Pat. Nothing was racist, but suit yourself. Did I not just say in the last post that this place is plagued by political correctness BS? I guess I'll know if you don't like this next time I attempt to log in. but you have nothing to worry about. I won't comment anything more and aim it at you. Seems it doesn't work too well. =)

here's one correction too, if it helps: foreigners => correct = non-white americans and people living in foreign countries.
 

Steve R.

Retired
Local time
Yesterday, 22:02
Joined
Jul 5, 2006
Messages
4,617
I'm re-posting the video below found by @AccessBlaster as applicable to the theme of this thread. "Democrats: Break America to Re-Make America"

 
Last edited:

The_Doc_Man

Immoderate Moderator
Staff member
Local time
Yesterday, 21:02
Joined
Feb 28, 2001
Messages
27,001
Adam, you did not recognize your rants as racist because your perspectives are inherently skewed. I long ago forgave you for being liberal. I forgave you for being religious. I forgave you for posting technically deficient content. You often in the past claimed to be intelligent, but you have frequently failed to recognize the image you paint for yourself. You might wish to consider the poem by Robert Burns that ends with

"O, wad some Power the giftie gie us, to see oursels as others see us! It wad frae monie a blunder free us, an' foolish notion."

(Think of it as someone doing a really thick Scottish accent and it will be clearer.)

Your comments, while at least partly true, are couched in language that makes them seem racist in nature because of their negative overtones mixed with references to foreigners and (specifically) to Chinese people. I have learned to see past your baloney. Others here have not, for reasons on which I will not speculate.

Your comments show this basic fact: You fail to realize that the most altruistic person you could imagine would eventually be forced to look at cost-saving measures and Draconian rationing of services even though it would be their desire to fully help everyone. But remember that (so far as you or anyone else knows) there was only one person who EVER fed a multitude starting from seven loaves and seven fishes (or whatever the actual number was...) and that person is long gone, leaving behind only advice. The rest of us are forced to contend with non-infinite resources and yet seeming infinite poverty.

You obviously don't like capitalism but other methods in the past (feudalism, socialism, communism) have each failed in one way or another. The work of psychologist Abraham Maslow clearly showed the pyramid of motivational needs. The other "isms", because they don't allow you to keep the majority of the fruits of your labor, are DEmotivational in nature.

By the way, Facebook doesn't NEED for you to have a high profile to decide to take you down. They use BOTS for that purpose, remember? And they has as many bots as the need to find you, even in your presumed isolation.
 

conception_native_0123

Well-known member
Local time
Yesterday, 21:02
Joined
Mar 13, 2021
Messages
1,826
You obviously don't like capitalism but other methods in the past (feudalism, socialism, communism) have each failed in one way or another.
every system fails to some degree becausee society is stupid. you should know that by now richard. you say the same thing don't you? i've read it many times here.
By the way, Facebook doesn't NEED for you to have a high profile to decide to take you down. They use BOTS for that purpose, remember?
whops! I forgot! machine learning, now I remember! come to think of it, I just watched a youtube video by a person called #techlead in which he explains the reasons why one should NOT become a programmer. he claims that machine learning is getting so good that programmers now just put in inputs into a machine and out pops the code to use. I wouldn't doubt that for a minute. especially in california.

as for the rest of your post, I guess I'll take it to heart. but I still don't think it was racist. I said nothing about chinese people except a small reference to "chinese sweatboxes", which I guess sounds pretty bad. the point was to point out steve jobs' manipulation of cheap chinese labor. that was the point.
 

conception_native_0123

Well-known member
Local time
Yesterday, 21:02
Joined
Mar 13, 2021
Messages
1,826
but you can't see your own posts impartially.
don't you think, richard, that someone who is called a racist would be, in fact, a white supremacist republican a$$hole more than anything? that makes perfect sense, given the reputation of republicans.
 

conception_native_0123

Well-known member
Local time
Yesterday, 21:02
Joined
Mar 13, 2021
Messages
1,826
Watch who you're calling a Republican.
i called myself one Pat! what in the heck are you reading!? or was that sarcasm? moreover, I made a slight reference to liberals claiming all the time that republicans can be white supremacists. there ARE such people, after all.
 

Jon

Access World Site Owner
Staff member
Local time
Today, 02:02
Joined
Sep 28, 1999
Messages
7,305
Whilst we are on the topic of racism, does anyone else think the term "white privilege" is racist?
 

Steve R.

Retired
Local time
Yesterday, 22:02
Joined
Jul 5, 2006
Messages
4,617
Whilst we are on the topic of racism, does anyone else think the term "white privilege" is racist?
In this era of "woke" non-binariasm, I'll go out on a limb and give the binary response of: "yes". The "top" obvious reason that "White privilege" should be considered racist is that it is the creation of the racist "Critical Race Theory" crowd for the express purpose of vilifying those who are White, based solely on their skin color. Going a bit deeper, the less obvious reason, the phrase "White privilege" is being used as a mantra to deconstruct Western culture, the theme of this thread.

The article below may indicate that the "woke" culture pushing "privilege" as a means of manipulation is hitting new highs of irrational exuberance and absurdity, and may collapse should rationality return to the populace. Of course, there are some legitimate aspects to "privilege", one such concern planing for handicap access.

Kurt Vonnegut explored the extremes of "privilege" back in October 1961. I'm re-posting: "Kurt Vonnegut was prescient. He wrote a short story: "Harrison Bergeron". Full text of "Harrison Bergeron" here." It's a good read.
 
Last edited:

AccessBlaster

Registered User.
Local time
Yesterday, 19:02
Joined
May 22, 2010
Messages
5,828
Whilst we are on the topic of racism, does anyone else think the term "white privilege" is racist?
The simple answer is no, our children are being taught only white persons of European ancestry are capable of being racist.
 

Jon

Access World Site Owner
Staff member
Local time
Today, 02:02
Joined
Sep 28, 1999
Messages
7,305
The simple answer is no, our children are being taught only white persons of European ancestry are capable of being racist.
So to spot a racist, you decide based on skin colour? That makes sense...
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top Bottom