Search results

You endlessly make provocative comments on topics where you demonstrate that you are clueless. Consequently, you have no credibility for making remarks, such as the one above.

Trump has an imaginative sense of irony. South Africa has gone off the rails with being anti-White and antisemitic. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c86p8q482x3o Just recently Trump expelled the South African Ambassador to the US for being hostile to the US and spewing racism...

The cartoon below illustrates the themes where Democrats are "rejecting" moderation and common sense. Hence they have no credibility. Conservatives on the other hand are restoring moderation and common sense to this Nation.

When faced with budget cuts and or government shutdowns the left loves to pull-out the crying towel. https://www.propublica.org/article/national-parks-staff-cuts-talking-points But consider this: The Nation is trillions of dollars in debt and continues to spend more than we take-in in revenue...

So what? A pointless fact without substance. Look at the Democrats supporting the racist factually challenged 1619 project.

According to the Democrats, climate change is the threat to life on earth. Biden issued numerous regulations aimed at putting cars and appliance dependent on fossil fuels out of business. Now that Musk has joined with Trump, Musk is being cancelled. As one high profile example: Mark Kelly touts...

@Mike Krailo: Fully agree. A pet peeve though, the left does something illegal with very little legal push-back. However, when conservatives attempt to correct that abuse, all of sudden the left sanctimoniously claims that the law must be scrupulously followed and that those affected have...

I have heard that Congress can limit the jurisdiction of the District Courts to their defined areas. This would stop the "judges in their tracks". Now, if only, the Republicans can: "Hurry up and get the legislation through now".

So we are supposed to believe in a judge with TDS and who also supported the abuse of the FISA court would actually make a legitimate ruling? Seems that he should have recused himself. Since he didn't that means that his faux legal decision was really nothing more than a Democratic partisan...

Now multiply that by 600+ judges all claiming the same jurisdiction.

Apple shakes up AI executive ranks in bid to turn around Siri, Bloomberg News reports Just tossing this in for the irony. The, DOGE effort is to shake-up the federal government. The Democrats have gone ballistic asserting how the DOGE shake-up violates all sorts of laws, that the public needs to...

The article below highlights a failure of our legal system. The Biden administration invites millions of illegal aliens to enter this country without any vetting. Now when it comes to deporting them, Democrats (all of sudden) assert that, each illegal alien is "entitled" to a full range of...

An additional, very relevant observation from Miller: "It takes 5 Supreme Court justices to issue a ruling that affects the whole nation. Yet lone District Court judges assume the authority to unilaterally dictate the policies of the entire executive branch of government." As pointed out by Mark...

Evidently there are over 600 District Court Judges. Levin contemplates how the president can even do anything if anyone of these judges has an opportunity to place an injunction on the president. The Executive Branch will be paralyzed. This is judicial tyranny...

Since you don't want to demonstrate that you actually know something, one can conclude that you are simply blowing smoke. Therefore, you are not a credible person.

You made an assertion. It is your responsibility to back-up your assertions and cite the source.

A half truth, that does not answer the question. The District Court is an "inferior" court. You did not address the issue concerning the extent of of its authority. Therefore you can't simply say: "District courts have original jurisdiction over cases arising under the Constitution, laws, or...