Search results

I responded with a quote that heavily implied to not be peaceful. You Trump worshippers just have selective hearing/reading and refuse to acknowledge anything that doesn't praise Trump.

He said that after the fact. His quote to storm DC and "be wild" should be enough. That was from December. Biden sucks too. They can both be bad. It doesn't excuse Trumps actions and is not a good defense.

The riot was planned and Trump shared the tweets about it and egged on the very people that planned it. How would he not be partially responsible? In a position of power, you have responsibilities and can certainly be at fault for what others do when you not only don't tell others not to do...

He knew the groups that were going were prone to it yet he personally retreated their plans. He's either really native and stupid or he knew what he was doing. Probably a lot of both. In either case, you can be held liable for something you cause out of ignorance or with purpose.

As he continued to retweet the plans set up by these groups on that day leading up to the day of and praising them. Some of the people he retweeted were already on watch lists due to the ties to possible extremism. He egged it on. He knew there was a risk and didn't care.

Or we refer to his tweet, naturally, from Twitter. Dec. 19: Trump tweeted his praise for a report by his adviser Peter Navarro alleging election fraud: "A great report by Peter. Statistically impossible to have lost the 2020 Election. Big protest in D.C. on January 6th. Be there, will be wild!"

Oh give me a break. The actual rulers of the New America were clearly Republican.

"Other people's opinions" That's what Trumpets believe. Anyone who doesn't like Trump must be listening to others and not thinking for themselves. Broken records. Seriously.

You pointed out yourself that Clinton was accused of assault yet you continue to support Trump after he was. I think both are creeps. Doesn't that make you a hypocrite? I'm not a Biden or Trump supporter before you try to lay that on me. Biden is creepy too. We will continue to get these...

I'm confused. Do Trumpers want companies to be liable for what is said on their network or not? He seemed to want them to be liable. But since they removed him for inciting a riot, that's no longer true? Or is it only applicable that they are liable if it's something against Trumpets?

I form my own opinions, thank you. I don't need others to tell me how I feel. Is that how you operate or something?

Or maybe Person 1 not say the racist thing? That is ignorant. Seriously. So people should ignore when a leader days something divisive to start with? That's your solution? GTFOOH.

Hypocrites love calling others hypocrites. It's not. Yes you can. Wrong. You CAN ban someone in spite of being a protected class. You CAN'T ban someone BECAUSE they are a protected class. There's a difference. This makes the rest of your rant about Africa moot. No. He hasn't done...

After Trump has been the most divisive President in recent history? I don't think so.

@Pat Hartman I explained what I was referring to. I won't again. It wasn't Trump or Twitter. So, more regulating private business? Isn't that against Republican values? It's against mine. And how are they the only ones? New social apps pop up daily. You also don't need them. I don't use...

My post was about Parler. Do try to keep up. You guys bounce all over the place as much as Trump. I'm not Twitter. I don't have to answer for their decisions. I already said I miss him on there. What else can I say or do?

Do you not think they should remove content organizing attacks? That's what was happening and they weren't originally doing anything about it. The FBI claims the threats are credible. Edit: On a side note, I kind of wish he was on Twitter still. It was like reading comics every day.

Except you're not forced to use them. Nobody is. I would hate to be forced to allow someone to use my app that I didn't want there. I think that starts just as dangerous of a precedent. So where do we find a balance? He can't say he didn't receive any warning.

Of course you don't. You go into it biased.

The nation didn't censor Trump, a private corporation decided they didn't want him on their platform. Just like we ban people on this forum at times. As for the inciting violence issue, I was speaking of Parlor. Apparently the FBI reported credible threats of violence from that application...