Search results

You are right I hadn't noticed it This could already be a possible work-around, even if it is not clear why if I type 11 it takes it immediately while if I type 5 it needs the space

2013 ProPlus Italian / 32bit

I'm confused Did you use the example I posted or did you make your own example?

I tried and actually removing the -1 also works with Autoexpand=true This Access is really strange

Yes, OK So is it a combobox problem? I mean, with Autoexpand=true it's not possible to use it? Why does it work correctly with values above 11 and with values lower than 11 it doesn't work?

You must type on Cod.Cli combobox, not on Caus.Contabile

I need your help with a problem that sometimes comes up A form with some comboboxes and other objects Inside the RowSource property of the combos are linked to the underlying db Some combos behave strangely in the sense that if I type in a value that is definitely present among the lines...

Each task can be performed in many ways, adapting to the available tools, and currently there are countless tools to perform practically any task But if you want to perform a certain activity in a certain well-defined way, the only possibility is to create something from scratch In this sense...

Have any of you already 'got your hands' on the available versions or have you done any experiments? Searching for information and using the little word 'database' you can't find much What do you think?

Yes, this is what I'm trying to accomplish Of course, modifying the content of some events on many forms/reports is a very expensive operation If there was the possibility of acting "from the outside" it would be a great thing But I imagine it's not feasible

I would like to publicly thank Vlad Cucinschi who kindly offered to send me a working copy of his demo program for user management The one available on the website didn't seem to be working properly I wrote to him and he sent me a working copy of the demo

How to implement a generic functionality limitation system for some users of the Access procedure? Let me explain, let's suppose that the access to the Access procedure is granted to users user1, user2, user3 Suppose you want to allow the user user1 to do everything, the user2 to do everything...

Is video recording of the event available?

This is good, I've never heard of it :ROFLMAO: But it's true

Where did you read that I wrote "..copy db1 to pc2.."? Db1 remains ONLY on pc1 (suppose you have a Sql Server installed on pc1), and is read/written by pc2, pc3, pc4 No conflict can occur since the requests that pc2, pc3, pc4 send to pc1/db1 are serialized by the db-server system which...

The presence of communication via RDP is not THE obstacle to the problem to be solved We could also get both the rdp server and the http-rdp gateway out of the way Well, let's do it, just to understand exactly the problem and how to overcome it Suppose we have the classic client-server setup...

Maybe you didn't read the post I sent properly I indicated the use of an html-rdp gateway such as Myrtille or similar From the user's point of view it will only be necessary to use only a web browser No need to use the rdp protocol in any way The problem is precisely on user authentication...

Yes, of course, we all know that there are better tools for building an e-commerce But that's not the point The answer to your question could be given by Christopher Columbus, or Edison, or Guiglielmo Marconi, or Christian Barnard or Elon Musk who wants to go to Mars But why they dedicated...

Suppose we have a computer with a Windows operating system, which has terminal services active And suppose we also install an http to rdp gateway, for example Myrtille And then using a web browser, it should be possible to connect to an available session on the terminal server Do you think it...

With this sentence you make people think that there might be a reason somewhere Much more modestly, I would speak of different opinions in dealing with a certain aspect in the supply of a product