Search results

What do you mean "..too painful.."??? At the minutes I indicated, minutes 11.05, you can see that the test program form is loaded a maximum of 8 times While in the following case, minutes 22.22, the same form is loaded 20 times. The only difference is the activation of the Laa flag

I have an Access procedure that searches for newer versions upon startup If available, downloads them to the root program directory and creates a new icon on the desktop to launch them Sometimes, newer versions require an additional library in the references; otherwise, the code won't work...

Yes, we are talking about objects 11.05 22.22

"...I've never seen..." Now you can see it

Not for the graphics, which at least to me seem like a minor piece of crap But, in the 64-bit version, for the improved memory management, which allows you to avoid all the problems related to the number of objects usable within a single project, and this in itself seems to me to be a...

BE is Firebird Sql

Yes, I know that's how it works I don't understand why it doesn't work even after the update I've never found any justification for this in official Microsoft documentation.

This is what the technical specifications said I don't know how to use the three values The code I write only uses sha256

rs("DATA_IMPORTAZIONE") is a timestamp

I haven't found this in the official documentation yet

Yes, of course, if I move the InsertPrincipalRecord = NewID line before the rs.UPDATE, everything works fine But I was curious to understand why the value of rs("ID_FERICEVUTE") is no longer available immediately after the update.

By debugging step by step, up to the line rs("ANNOTATIONS")="" the value of rs("ID_FERICEVUTE") is valid After running rs.update, the value of rs("ID_FERICEVUTE") is no longer valid If it were something dependent on the previous routines, you would have seen it before row rs("ANNOTATIONS")=""

Why the row InserisciRecordPrincipale = rs("ID_FERICEVUTE") not recognize rs("ID_FERICEVUTE")? When RS.UPDATE is invoked, rs("ID_FERICEVUTE") lost his value Going step by step, you can see that the rs("id_fericevute") is correctly readable up to the rs.update line Without Close, or...

Hoping this will be helpful to anyone who needs to solve the same problem, I'm writing my experience here for future reference.In the end I gave up and managed the process using the file name So, to determine whether a certain file has been imported or not, simply check whether it's present in...

Yes, I think using Robocopy's parallel processing capability could be a valid reason to use this system I think I'll keep robocopy's lightning-fast performance and process the log produced for a copy of just the missing files.

I can't work with the date of individual files. Today I might receive a file with a creation/modification date that is older than the files already present

No, the c:\fatture directory is read-only for me It's not my stuff, but the program that receives them, which is another business But after phase 1, the destination directory, c:\gest\fatture, is completely at my disposal and I can do whatever I want with it. Yes, I could work with the file...

Two files could have the same timestamp, how do you check based on the timestamp? Yes, you're right, they SHOULD not change

Rather than access code, it's a matter of how to perform a file copy and read procedure without having to reread the files already read These are XML invoices; they normally arrive in the directory c:\fatture and remain there forever When the operator decides to acquire them into the...

Has anyone ever used DaDaBik? It's a project designed to create forms and reports connected to a database, accessible via the web with a simple browser Essentially, it prepares HTML/PHP/CSS code that is then executed on a local/public web server I personally tried this program many years ago and...