Search results

Biden isn't leading the riots.

And both are stupid. The biggest problem with the Trump rally is he should be leading by example. They could have been done with safety precautions in mind. Makes you wonder how much this administration really cares about the people.

Or stupid frat parties. It really doesn't make a difference if you're outside with thousands of people within 6 feet of each other and no mask.

So, different from a Trump campaign then? ;)

I don't care what your reasons or political stances. If you're congregating together en masse for ANY reason and not wearing masks and social distancing, you're idiots.

We've all been exposed to coronaviruses, just not THE coronavirus that causes COVID-19. The best way to avoid that classic arm soreness is to completely relax the muscle and not flinch when she jobs it into your shoulder without warning at 200 mph. Good luck! Really though, I feel your...

The point is to lessen exposure to prevent the healthcare industry from being overwhelmed. This is to prevent a higher death percentage not just from this virus, but from all the other health conditions mentioned here including heart disease and cancer. When hospitals have to start rationing...

There you go talking about Richard's age again. You just can't refrain yourself, can you? Is mocking people older than you fun to you? Do you think that just because you didn't use the words "grandpa" or "old man" that you're not transparent?

You didn't answer the question. You responded with another question.

I know, which is why I don't understand what you are trying to accomplish. So you concede then that the current advice of Fauci and the other health advisors should be followed?

In his actual quote, he didn't admit he "lied." He stated that they were concerned about the lack of supplies and already "knew" it wasn't very effective at protecting the wearer. The misleading is in that they didn't take into consideration that it could help protect others from the wearer...

They said masks are ineffective at protecting the wearer. THEY STILL SAY THAT. Since then, they have found that masks are effective in HELPING prevent spread by potentially protecting those around you. It's more of an amendment than a change. ORIGINAL: Masks are ineffective in protecting...

I'm not going to stay and argue just for the sake of arguing. Have a good one.

Because medics needed masks to stop the spread of other diseases, same as they always wear masks for. I don't understand why that is confusing.

Are you saying we shouldn't listen to their advice because someone else might know better? Of course they are not always right, but they are the best source of information regarding protecting society from this virus. We should listen.

No, I'm not conceding they were wrong. I don't think they were. At the time, lack of supplies and needing to protect the healthcare workers took precedent. They overwhelmingly suggested staying home at the time until supplies could be made available. They are now.

Because people can social distance and avoid going out. Medics are at higher risk by simply doing their jobs. There can't be any disputing they are clearly at the highest risk.

Also, you have to consider lack of supplies at the time. I know the US was at risk of hospitals running out of supplies early on. The advice at the time was sound with that taken into consideration. Now homemade masks are rampant and the instruction has changed.

What CURRENT advice should we not follow?

That goes back to opinions changing as we learn more. The current instruction is to use them and has been for many months.