Search results

Here is the issue (and thanks for the help): I have a Quality Database that I am taking over. Be gentle, the design isn't good :)... (Keep in mind this is being redesigned) There are 4 different quality questionnaires. Each has a dedicated table that logs pertinent info, and a reference...

I checked and they have the rights to add/delete records. Can I upload a copy of it to make it easier?

I'm sorry to be such a pain. Since I am not getting clear answers from them should I just have each user test the add and delete ability?

And add/delete is referring to the directory and not access it self?

I was told that they have "Modify" rights which they said was the same as read/write rights.

Are there any other issues that it could be.. I gave a list of Users to the network admin, and he said that all those users have read/write/execute rights for that directory. There are a part of a permissions group that has that built in.

I did. Thank you again.

aaww ok. Thanks for that. I got back to work today, and opened a ticket to check the rights for both.. they should be able to do anything including subfolders right?

As far as the record selector, yes we do have them and it shows the typical locked symbol. If I look at the records that happen to be locked at the time, I get the same symbol that they get on the front end. - The reason that I asked about the network, to see if the bandwidth could be the...

The only thing that I have been given is that they all have r/w access. Otherwise I haven't been given anything beyond that (as I don't manage the server that the network drive is on).. Are there certain rights that would cause that? So I can have a more detailed conversation with them?

The issue was that they are only able to see their owner records (as it auto detects the user id and uses that as criteria).. So they should be the only ones that have that one specific record locked. That is where I had the issue - Because it wasn't all the time, and was sporadic.. Do you...

Yes they do.

The front end: The employees log their time by hr. So there is an hour selection, hidden text box that detects the current date, their windows user id, and the activity that they are logging. All those are the criteria. So for that specific data there should be only one record for that hour...

Currently I have a database that is used for time tracking for activities of each employee. I have split the database, and the back-end is on a shared drive. If I have just a few users no issues - But if there are more, it acts weird.. On the main form there are several subforms linking to...

They are all on two monitors. Are you suggesting doing some sort of Me.move onload to move it to a different location? Are you thinking that it is open just that they can't get to the form?

I am having an issue with a front end of an Access 2010 database that is shared on a network. On open it pulls to a switchboard that has several options for forms to open. They are called Fast,Feast,National,Full. There are 12 users that use the database. 10 out of the 12 users have no...

Sorry, can you elaborate? I have attached a copy of a test db, for testing the process. The data table has the log for each QA that was performed. So the record has several different critieria including the scores. Should I be breaking the data up ?

Thank you for the help. I have used that method before to get all employees that do have a "2" score. But what I am needing is separate records. But say the score is such Employee: "Me", Score1: "2", Score 2:"2" this is how I need it... that is why I wrote union query to get separate results...

Here is the scenario: Database (that I inherited), is for QA purposes.. Fields-> Employee Name, Score1, Score2, Score3, Score4, etc.. What I am needing to do is write a query, that gives a separate record for the employee where any of the scores are a "2". I could write a union query but there...