Search results

Libre: It might have convinced you. But it certainly did not give a logical explanation for why apes are still here, after they were replaced by their supposed updated versions aka human beings. You are making things up as you go. You are attempting to talk your way around the problem of...

Libre: You claim that I am presenting a straw man argument, but at the same time, you admit "you don't know" that the scientific community asserts that every single creature that has ever walked this earth came from a single common ancestor (bolded in red). You then turn around and decide to...

Galaxiom: By your own admission, what we have is a fossil record in which there is nothing but gaps or missing links ("an incomplete fossil record" as you put it). The result? We end up with creatures jumping from Creature A to Creature D with nothing in between (Creature B and Creature C)...

Galaxiom: By your own admission, we do not see a complete record in the fossils. So at this point, you are telling me your religions belief when you persist in arguing for something for which there is no evidence. It is called blind faith: the same blind faith that atheists routinely accuse...

Galaxiom: I bet you wrote that with a straight face. How in the world does anyone "predict evidence that may be found in the future" and refer to that as "the scientific method"? The scientific method is based upon evidence that has already been discovered. It is not based on the...

Galaxiom: You are confirming what I stated, that Punctuated Equilibrium aka science fiction removes the need for transitional fossils--while you are telling me that I need to "understand" what I am criticizing. By your own admission (at the portions of your post that I quoted in light blue)...

Galaxiom: The words "even if" are quite revealing. Those are the words people use when they are determined to not use reason. Those words speak for blind faith--belief in something for which there is no evidence. Yet, according to you, I am the one living in fantasy...

Galaxiom: Exactly when do you intend to explain to the rest of us how evolution's common ancestor came to life without Jehovah? Charles Darwin proposed abiogenesis (life coming to life by itself from non-life). But if I were you, I would not waste time proposing that. Abiogenesis theory was...

Galaxiom: It matters not what Mayr said in subsequent paragraphs. By his own admission, the gaps between species are "bridgeless," indicating there is no connection between one species from another. The fact that he made the same admission some 20 years apart (from 1982 to 2001) speaks for...

ConnorGiles: You are talking to me about "real evidence," while you continue to repeat the same false claims about fossilization? That was taken from post 8--after I quoted Ernst Mayr at post 3, where he stated the following: "What one actually found was nothing but discontinuities: All...

ConnorGiles: As they say in legal jargon, "Res ipsa loquitur" which means "the thing speaks for itself." Every single human being on this planet worships someone or something. You know that, I know that, and everybody reading this thread knows that. Alter2Ego ________________ "That people...

ConnorGiles: People do not get credit for repeatedly trying at the same thing and consistently failing, so I do not have a clue what you are being "fair" about. Pro-evolution scientists have been trying to validate evolution myth since Charles Darwin's time: more than 150 years. They have...

Frothingslosh: I am not surprised that you are taking your leave, considering the insurmountable problem you are faced with of explaining how evolution's common ancestor came to life from non-life by itself. Mr. Evolution aka Charles Darwin said every single organic being that has ever walked...

Frothingslosh: Ernst Mayr was a pro-evolutionist and a paleontologist. He admitted in 1982 that based on the fossils record, all species are separated by "bridgeless gaps"--meaning there is no connection between one type of species to another. The so-called Archaeopteryx is a completely...

Frothingslosh: The claimed "intermediate" forms have never been confirmed in the fossils record. There are no fossils showing how, for example, Creature A turned into Creature C. The "intermediates" you are referring to are actually completely different creatures that did not evolve from one...

ALTER2EGO -to- EVERYONE: ORGANIC/BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION THEORY is chained to abiogenesis theory (the belief that life resulted from non-life spontaneously). When asked how life came from non-life by itself, atheists have no credible answer. CREATION is the conclusion that the appearing...

ConnorGiles: It depends which "believing religions" you are referring to when you say they "expect" you to convert. That is not an expection that my religious group has when it discusses scripture with various ones. We present people with information that is intended to help them make...

Galaxiom: Wrong. The choice of religious beliefs is what can be instilled in people. The desire to worship can never be instilled in anyone, because that desire is inherent to all humans. Then that explains why atheists worship science fiction--their substitute for a god. They worship...

Galaxiom: Science has nothing to do with the fact that humans are created beings and that they were created with the desire to worship. Now, what or whom they choose to worship is an entirely different matter, but worship they will. Which millions would that be? Every single person in...

ConnorGiles: Religion will never become obsolete. Why not? ANSWER: Because all humans were created with the desire to worship. As for your speculation about finding life outside planet earth aka science fiction, what has that to do with the fact that all humans are religious and they...