Search results

  1. R

    Numerical Data entry form strategy multiple records

    thanks for the input! I agree simple is better, but i would like a bit more automation. Essentially I am the bridge between our Regan era cash registers and some kind of modern record keeping, so I do a lot of data entry. This is just one task of many. I have been (of course) using Excel until...
  2. R

    Numerical Data entry form strategy multiple records

    What is the correct form strategy to ease numerical data entry into a table that requires multiple records? tblHourlySales tracks the sales per hour of our store. Each record has 4 fields: pk CalendarDate Hour Sales At the end of the day I want to be able to enter sales using a 10 key pad to...
  3. R

    Normalizing audit log

    Thanks for the reply Dave/Gemma, If I hear you correctly. The values stored in that table, shouldn't be relationally linked to any other tables that are updated over time because the audit entry should not change. I.e. I don't want the entry for the starting wage to change when I change the...
  4. R

    Normalizing audit log

    thanks for taking an interest. Let me back up a bit: tblEmployees - name, address, wage, etc FK locations FK Jobs tblLog - date, wage change, notes FK Employee FK Jobs FK Locations FK Actions tbl actions - new hire, termination, raise, etc tbljobs - crew, manager, etc tbl locations -...
  5. R

    Normalizing audit log

    Hello. A question about designing relationships with an audit log. I am setting up a HR db. I want to create a table that records actions performed to employees. I am noticing that my relationships are growing more complex and don't want normalization problems long term. TblEmployees...
  6. R

    code and macros living in harmony?

    "Hello world" I'm an excel junkie turned Access fanatic, but very new to the environment. I am slowly learning how VBA works and basic database design. As is typical for me, my aspirations are higher than my skill and the learning curve is slow. I have started with (what I thought would be...
Back
Top Bottom