Search results

Once I've reduced the images to their current size, Access deals with them OK. Are you saying that the quality of the printed output would improve if I reduced them further ie that Access is taking liberties with the larger files (in order to render them) which it wouldn't do with the smaller ones?

Bob, you are spot on. That is exactly my experience. It's a bummer really because in some of our reports the picture is everything so we need maximum quality. I've even considered, on very dark nights, investigating Filemaker...

The original pics are 3648 x 2432. I use Qimage to reduce the size to 1024x768 (which is a pre-set) but I suspect, from what you say, that I should be reducing them to 1024 x 683. Anything much above that does not seem to print/display which is at odds with the advice I was originally given by...

Cool. I certainly will try it. Very many thanks

On my report I have a 9cm x 6cm image control. This is reluctant to print, or display, images unless I reduce their resolution to 1024x768. Reducing them in this way reduces their printed quality. Is this restriction on resolution by design? If not, is there anything I can do to force...

This is the relevant bit: DoCmd.OutputTo acOutputReport, "lrptKUWMain", _ acFormatPDF, "h:\data\igdb\cd\" & strRegNo & "-" & strSession & ".pdf", False DoCmd.Close acReport, "lrptKUWMain", acSaveNo The code hasn't altered between versions but the quality of the output has

I'm noticing a significant loss of quality in images exported to PDF from Access 2010 as opposed to Acess 2007. I am using the Standard (rather than Minimum Size) optimization. Reproduction of images to PDF is a huge part of what we do with our database and it never occurred to me a...