boblarson
Smeghead
- Local time
- Yesterday, 21:08
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2001
- Messages
- 32,059
So this:
http://sports.espn.go.com/oly/news/story?id=5373710&campaign=rss&source=ESPNHeadlines
I can't see how a country can tax someone's global earnings just because they earned some money there. It doesn't seem right to me.
Just to put it into perspective, here in the U.S., when I work in Oregon, I get taxed on my Oregon earnings. If I live in Washington and work in Oregon, I get taxed on my Oregon earnings. If I live in Washington and do a job in Oregon and the rest of the year I work in Washington, Oregon taxes me for the work I did in Oregon, but NOT in Washington.
So I can understand it if athletes might not want to compete in Great Britain if they are going to get taxed on the other parts of their earnings as well.
http://sports.espn.go.com/oly/news/story?id=5373710&campaign=rss&source=ESPNHeadlines
I can't see how a country can tax someone's global earnings just because they earned some money there. It doesn't seem right to me.
Just to put it into perspective, here in the U.S., when I work in Oregon, I get taxed on my Oregon earnings. If I live in Washington and work in Oregon, I get taxed on my Oregon earnings. If I live in Washington and do a job in Oregon and the rest of the year I work in Washington, Oregon taxes me for the work I did in Oregon, but NOT in Washington.
So I can understand it if athletes might not want to compete in Great Britain if they are going to get taxed on the other parts of their earnings as well.