Election Fraud Opportunities (1 Viewer)

[Steve R.]

The Democrats sanctimoniously proclaim that our elections have "integrity" yet they oppose all measures to improve the integrity of the election process. One such simple requirement is voter verification. Not only that but they also glowingly proclaim that no fraud was found in the 2020 presidential election. An egregious aspect that opens a "door" for election fraud (that the Democrats supported) is that ballot can be deposited at unsecured locations and that some ballots can even be accepted and counted after election day! So who is depositing the ballots and in some cases who is burning the drop-boxes? These carefully planned opportunities for election fraud, beg the obvious question, if voter identification is not required and the rules concerning the ballot box are lax, the ability to identify election fraud becomes virtually non-existent. Democrats do not want "clean" elections, they want murky elections were the results can be endlessly litigated should the voting go against them.

Though not considered fraud in the usual sense, the 2020 election and the 2024 election were and are being manipulated by a left wing press that vilifies conservative candidates and glorify left wing candidates. Currently, the left has once again resurrected the concept that conservatives are Nazis. This constitutes manipulation of the voting process.

How Courts Are Impacting 2024 Election: Nevada Supreme Court Lets More Ballots Arrive After Election Day

Courts are responding to lawsuits across the country on how ballots and voter rolls are handled in the weeks before Election Day.

www.forbes.com

https://twitter.com/x/status/1851224940957351972

Ballot boxes burned, hundreds of votes destroyed in Washington, Oregon arson cases

Two arsons occurred at ballot drop boxes 15 miles from each other on Monday morning in Portland, Oregon and Vancouver, Washington.

www.usatoday.com

https://twitter.com/x/status/1851106885589459172

 

[GaP42]

Election fraud is not just carried on at the level of the SC. You might also consider the bigger picture - will we see a repeat? Can you trust them?
America's Last Election Part 1`The BIG Lie
America's Last Election: Part 2: Fake Electors

 

[Pat Hartman]

Please don't bother reviewing any of the evidence presented. And please do not plan on sending "Fake" Electors should the anointed one fail to close the deal. Trump will put them in jail using the same "law" that the Democrats did.

Please also tell me why it is more convenient to drop a ballot into a ballot box than to put it in your OWN mailbox with the flag up? I'll help you out. Using a ballot box breaks the chain of custody making it far easier to insert bogus ballots into the counting location. The Democrat policy of counting until you win also comes into play in this scenario. Trump over performed in 2020 which is why 6 counting centers needed to shut down until they could manufacture enough ballots to overcome Trump's support.

Doesn't look like Harris can muster anywhere near the votes that "good ol' Joe" managed. Dems aren't buying what she's selling.

 

[GaP42]

And yet you are not bothered at all by what went on in the last election - you could bear to see it or to hear it? A pre-planned strategy to usurp the election. So hypocritical - on the one hand to claim (unproven) voter fraud and yet ignore the attempt made to STEAL the election.
The rules for the process of registration and voting by citizens is decided by each state. There are therefore significant variations. You do not like some of them. Your problem - not mine. The courts have looked at many of these "issues" and seen nothing to support the contentions made.

 

[Steve R.]

A pre-planned strategy to usurp the election.

By the Democrats and the media to install Biden/Harris.
In February of 2021TIME Magazine published an article titled “The Secret History of the Shadow Campaign That Saved the 2020 Election” which described a vast effort by a network of partisan political operatives, union leaders, and business titans to create an election “revolution” to rig the 2020 election against Trump.

The Secret History of the Shadow Campaign That Saved the 2020 Election

For more than a year, a loosely organized coalition of operatives scrambled to shore up America’s institutions

time.com

 

[Pat Hartman]

So hypocritical - on the one hand to claim (unproven) voter fraud and yet ignore the attempt made to STEAL the election.

Every single Presidential election won by a Republican has challenges in the House to reject the proposed electors.

1. Why is it an attempt to steal an election when the Republicans voice the same opposition that Democrats voice regularly? The Dems objected to Bush and they objected to Trump. This is the way the system works.
2. Just how stupid are you to believe that Republicans tried to overthrow the election? Or how stupid do you believe that the people who actually ended up entering the Capitol building went there with the intent to obstruct anything and forgot to bring their guns to the party? You can fool yourself into believing this if you want to but why did the FBI feel the need to plant agitators in the crowd to get people to actually break down a door if they thought the crowd would be peaceful as most Republican crowds are?
3. Why did Pelosi reject Trump's offer of National Guard support? Let me help you out here. She was in on the plan. That was why her daughter was in the House filming.

As you can see by the previous article link, the Democrats even bragged about their cheating.

Once the Democrat cheating became apparent, no judge was willing to take a case where he might have to rule that the election was stolen. That is why most of the cases were dismissed for "standing". That means the judges never even looked at the evidence. They were too afraid to. Many of the cases that were heard resulted in wins for the Trump team and many changes have been made to election procedures as a result. And the Democrats are still fighting against fixing the problems. WHY do the Democrats want to keep non-citizens on the voter rolls? Ask yourself. What is the purpose of this?

 

[moke123]

Great article, old but good. Shows you how planning and organizing works. It wasn't partisan unless you deem the normally conservative Chamber of Commerce and evangelicals liberal. Podhorzer really pwned trump.

STRANGE BEDFELLOWS​

About a week before Election Day, Podhorzer received an unexpected message: the U.S. Chamber of Commerce wanted to talk.

The AFL-CIO and the Chamber have a long history of antagonism. Though neither organization is explicitly partisan, the influential business lobby has poured hundreds of millions of dollars into Republican campaigns, just as the nation’s unions funnel hundreds of millions to Democrats. On one side is labor, on the other management, locked in an eternal struggle for power and resources.

... Bradley wanted to send a broader, more bipartisan message. He reached out to Podhorzer, through an intermediary both men declined to name. Agreeing that their unlikely alliance would be powerful, they began to discuss a joint statement pledging their organizations’ shared commitment to a fair and peaceful election. They chose their words carefully and scheduled the statement’s release for maximum impact. As it was being finalized, Christian leaders signaled their interest in joining, further broadening its reach.

 

[GaP42]

to create an election “revolution” to rig the 2020 election against Trump.

Are you soo blinkered you cannot read / comprehend what it said?

 

[GaP42]

Just how stupid are you to believe that Republicans tried to overthrow the election? Or how stupid do you believe that the people who actually ended up entering the Capitol building went there with the intent to obstruct anything and forgot to bring their guns to the party? You can fool yourself into believing this if you want to but why did the FBI feel the need to plant agitators in the crowd to get people to actually break down a door if they thought the crowd would be peaceful as most Republican crowds are?

Or how stupid are you?
There was no undemocratic scheme by the Trump team to overthrow the election, using Pence - irrespective of any uprising? That is not simply complaining about a tight election loss and contention about vote counting - it is way more serious.

How Stupid are you?
The were just going for a walk in the park and Trump did nothing to encourage it?

So foolish!

 

[Steve R.]

Are you soo blinkered you cannot read / comprehend what it said?

Unfortunately you are so infected with Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS) that you are incapable of perceiving the fact that Democrats do not want election integrity. Democrats do everything that can to obfuscate the election process. Hence the title of this thread.
It also makes a mockery of attempting any rational discussion with you.

 

[GaP42]

Ditto

a mockery of attempting any rational discussion with you.

You and others here suffer from a form of Messianic Adoration Disorder (MAD) that you have lost any sense or ability to evaluate / assess the character of tRump

 

[Steve R.]

C

You and others here suffer from a form of Messianic Adoration Disorder (MAD) that you have lost any sense or ability to evaluate / assess or value the character of tRump

Trump is living rent free in you head. Enjoy!

 

[AccessBlaster]

Jamie Raskin is a Democratic U.S. Congressman from Maryland, known for his work as a constitutional law professor and as a prominent member of the House of Representatives.

 

[Pat Hartman]

I guess that's why all of DC is being boarded up

 

[AngelSpeaks]

I guess that's why all of DC is being boarded up

Yep. When Trump won in 2016, riots and looting were rampart in DC during his inauguration.

 

[Pat Hartman]

Pretty amazing though. No riots when Biden "won" in 2020 even though we all know he cheated.

 

[AccessBlaster]

With half the country believing Trump is Hitler, political violence is inevitable.

 

[Steve R.]

Jamie Raskin is a Democratic U.S. Congressman from Maryland, known for his work as a constitutional law professor and as a prominent member of the House of Representatives.

Here's the full article. Raskin is a disgusting partisan hack.

Rep. Jamie Raskin says there will be a peaceful transfer only if the election is 'free and fair'

"Of course there'll be a peaceful transfer, and there was last time," Trump said back in August, a pledge he has often repeated. "I just hope we're going to have honest elections."

justthenews.com

Raskin was on "Real Time with Bill Maher" on Friday, where he said, "When I say we will support a free and fair election, no we we're not going to allow them to steal it in the states, steal it with the Department of Justice or steal it with any other election official in the country. If it's a free and fair election, we will do what we've always done: Honor it."

The concern of course, Democrats will claim that it was not "a free and fair election,"

As for some background:

Raskin, the ranking member of the House Oversight Committee and a former member of the Jan. 6 select committee, pointed to legislation he introduced in 2022 designed to allow the Justice Department to sue to keep candidates off the ballot under the 14th Amendment.

Raskin was one of several Democratic congressmen who attempted to block Trump’s taking office in 2017 after he had defeated Hillary Clinton in the 2016 election, according to CNN.

Raskin is not a neutral Constitutional lawyer. He attempts of subvert the Constitution by applying lawfare to "create" fictitious law to persecute Trump.

Raskin Destroys His Party's Case Against Trump on January 6

Raskin said that he would honor the result if it were “free and fair," leaving himself a loophole and repeating the argument behind January 6.

www.breitbart.com

But now Raskin, and others, seem to be saying that they, too, would be open to challenging election results if they believed the election had been “stolen.”

In 2017, Raskin proudly joined other members of the Congressional Progressive Caucus in objecting to the certification of the 2016 election results in which former President Donald Trump won the presidency.

Raskin then led the second impeachment effort against Trump, and sat on the one-sided January 6 Committee to probe those who had engaged in a so-called “insurrection,” even though he himself had raised objections to the 2017 election and is prepared to do so in future.
So its OK for Democrats to challenge an election, but if Republicans challenge an election that's a criminal offense.

 

[Steve R.]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1853808133627355232

 

[AngelSpeaks]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1853808133627355232

Sounds like a threat to me.