Find as you typed (1 Viewer)

[hfsitumo2001]

In my form here attached I have 2 combo box, to fill the bound fields. Right now the source of the combo is table. This is the control source of the field:

SELECT DISTINCT Inventory.ItemCode, Inventory.[IUnitPrice], Inventory.Description FROM Inventory ORDER BY Inventory.Description;

How can I make it "find as you typed" not just the beginning of the description, but any part of the description, it will auto narrow selection to the closest names then we choose it.

 

[MajP]

I do this often so I use class module fo reuse
Post in thread 'Find as we typed' https://www.access-programmers.co.uk/forums/threads/find-as-we-typed.315813/post-1743564

 

[arnelgp]

i also have my version.

 

[Rene vK]

I do this often so I use class module fo reuse
Post in thread 'Find as we typed' https://www.access-programmers.co.uk/forums/threads/find-as-we-typed.315813/post-1743564

Is this a post by the same member but with other words???

 

[hfsitumo2001]

I do this often so I use class module fo reuse
Post in thread 'Find as we typed' https://www.access-programmers.co.uk/forums/threads/find-as-we-typed.315813/post-1743564

MajP, the problem is that mine is the filter is the bound coctrol source, while the samples that I got from this forum is unbound. Do you have the sample with the bound control source, which is part of the fields in the linked tables.. See below my form in the design view. Marked in red are the fields that I want to select. Right now it is working by typing part of the beginning of the data. What I want is any part of the data, will show to the closest one, that is the way of " find as you typed" that I want.

 

[MajP]

I asked you the same question as before, did you try it? There is no difference between bound and unbound in how this works. However the bottom form is continuous. In a continuous form you cannot restrict the values in the combobox because it will remove that from all innstances of the comobox. This is not unique to a FAYT. In this case you lay a textbox over the combox. This trick is done on cascading combox as well

Here is a bound. Notice the textboxes over top of each combo.

 

[hfsitumo2001]

I asked you the same question as before, did you try it? There is no difference between bound and unbound in how this works. However the bottom form is continuous. In a continuous form you cannot restrict the values in the combobox because it will remove that from all innstances of the comobox. This is not unique to a FAYT. In this case you lay a textbox over the combox. This trick is done on cascading combox as well

Here is a bound. Notice the textboxes over top of each combo.

Thank MajP, I will try it

 

[MajP]

FYI the textbox trick is only needed on continuous forms. If you get stuck you can post a sample DB.