SachAccess
Active member
- Local time
- Today, 05:05
- Joined
- Nov 22, 2021
- Messages
- 422
Hi Experts,
Hope you are doing good. I need your help. Though the topic suggests it is about Python however it is mostly about learning and how to learn.
I am VBA person. I want to learn Python. Just to keep myself safe and employable. No specific reason other than this.
Now coming to my dilemma or confusion. With the advent of GPT, code is just a prompt away, at least for a non-expert like me.
For my VBA tasks, I make most of it. I do not know if it is right or wrong, but it saves my time. Since I know VBA, I am ware how to and where to edit the GPT code.
And what kind of prompts I should feed to GPT.
For learning Python, I am giving prompt to GPT for simple Excel tasks, asking GPT about the code logic, terms which I do not understand.
I am aware that this is short-cut and not an ideal way to learn.
My question, since everyone is aware about GPT, using GPT, how do I justify to myself to learn with a non GPT approach.
End goal is to code, if person A is doing it with GPT and person B doing without GPT, if you are teach manager how does it matter or impacts to you.
If we assume that the end result is same from both the person, does the GPT interfere comes to the picture.
Also non-GPT learning curve would be steep compared to GPT assisted learning, then why I should not try to learn in less time.
For VBA too, prior to GPT, we had Forums like these, GOOGLE. How exactly it is different from taking help from forums, googling and getting a ready code for GPT.
One observation I had is, while learning with GPT, I get a false feeling that Python coding is easy but I know this is not the fact.
As a interviewer, what matters to you most, a person who can complete the job for you or a person who can answer Syntax questions.
Has the interview method too has changed post GPT. Will you focus more on logic part or the actual coding part.
Base line is, is the learning method has changed post GPT or it is just my assumption.
How to make most of it and don't get into the trap of ready codes.
Hope you are doing good. I need your help. Though the topic suggests it is about Python however it is mostly about learning and how to learn.
I am VBA person. I want to learn Python. Just to keep myself safe and employable. No specific reason other than this.
Now coming to my dilemma or confusion. With the advent of GPT, code is just a prompt away, at least for a non-expert like me.
For my VBA tasks, I make most of it. I do not know if it is right or wrong, but it saves my time. Since I know VBA, I am ware how to and where to edit the GPT code.
And what kind of prompts I should feed to GPT.
For learning Python, I am giving prompt to GPT for simple Excel tasks, asking GPT about the code logic, terms which I do not understand.
I am aware that this is short-cut and not an ideal way to learn.
My question, since everyone is aware about GPT, using GPT, how do I justify to myself to learn with a non GPT approach.
End goal is to code, if person A is doing it with GPT and person B doing without GPT, if you are teach manager how does it matter or impacts to you.
If we assume that the end result is same from both the person, does the GPT interfere comes to the picture.
Also non-GPT learning curve would be steep compared to GPT assisted learning, then why I should not try to learn in less time.
For VBA too, prior to GPT, we had Forums like these, GOOGLE. How exactly it is different from taking help from forums, googling and getting a ready code for GPT.
One observation I had is, while learning with GPT, I get a false feeling that Python coding is easy but I know this is not the fact.
As a interviewer, what matters to you most, a person who can complete the job for you or a person who can answer Syntax questions.
Has the interview method too has changed post GPT. Will you focus more on logic part or the actual coding part.
Base line is, is the learning method has changed post GPT or it is just my assumption.
How to make most of it and don't get into the trap of ready codes.
Last edited: