I have a query that contains nearly 200 fields. I have used naming conventions to name the fields -- most of them are as a result of performing using the result of a function against a value in the source table, the few others are just brought over from the single source table.
I started developing the query in the order in which the data will appear on a report, as I thought that would be easier to find the fields when creating the report. That worked, but I have rethought the report (the 22 inch maximum length of a report is too short). I have broken the report up into its component pages.
Questions:
1. Should I also break my query into its component parts, matching the report pages?
2. Is there any way to 'sort' the query fields, so they appear in alpha-numeric order? This would ease splitting the query.
TIA
oldgnome
I started developing the query in the order in which the data will appear on a report, as I thought that would be easier to find the fields when creating the report. That worked, but I have rethought the report (the 22 inch maximum length of a report is too short). I have broken the report up into its component pages.
Questions:
1. Should I also break my query into its component parts, matching the report pages?
2. Is there any way to 'sort' the query fields, so they appear in alpha-numeric order? This would ease splitting the query.
TIA
oldgnome