Is there anyway of using an SQL statement to build a recordset in memory and then work with it, THEN basing another SQL statement on the temporary recordset?
I always seem to get the message “cannot find the query or table”. Does an SQL statement have to be based on a query/table?
OR could I base an SQL statement on a recordset held in memory to add to, then manipulate, then display this recordset in a ListBox.
I don’t know much about arrays, but could you build an array and then base on SQL statement on that, or am I barking up the wrong tree, to find out that it simply isn’t possible to base SQL statements on anything other than query’s or tables?
I do have this working at the moment by but i use an SQL statement to build a local table, then i have a second SQL statement based on that table.
I’d just like the increased speed of doing the whole thing in memory as well as reducing the need to compact and number of tables in the back end database.
Thanks
Vince
I always seem to get the message “cannot find the query or table”. Does an SQL statement have to be based on a query/table?
OR could I base an SQL statement on a recordset held in memory to add to, then manipulate, then display this recordset in a ListBox.
I don’t know much about arrays, but could you build an array and then base on SQL statement on that, or am I barking up the wrong tree, to find out that it simply isn’t possible to base SQL statements on anything other than query’s or tables?
I do have this working at the moment by but i use an SQL statement to build a local table, then i have a second SQL statement based on that table.
I’d just like the increased speed of doing the whole thing in memory as well as reducing the need to compact and number of tables in the back end database.
Thanks
Vince