I have never advocated abortion as desirable. I have only advocated that it be available in a controlled situation so that a woman does not need to find a back-alley butcher. My comments are those of a pragmatist. I don't want it done very often, but if it IS to be done, it should be done properly and safely. NEVER mandate an abortion - but always allow a choice.
Your entire reply implies that you believe "get rid of roe v. wade" means, "make abortion illegal".
In some states, repealing Roe vs. Wade will do exactly that. Louisiana just passed an incredibly restrictive anti-abortion bill that would take away the rights for ALL repeat ALL abortions for any desperate women in my state. Kansas, North Carolina (or was that South Carolina?), and Texas are other states ready to block abortions immediately, states for which recent anti-abortion laws were stricken because of Roe vs. Wade.
What we are talking about is the fine line where people, regardless of their religious beliefs would consider a fetus viable and therefor a person that cannot be killed on a whim.
The question of viability out of the womb doesn't enter into the picture if Roe vs. Wade falls and the restrictive anti-abortion law just passed in Louisiana becomes law. Under that law, even a fetus diagnosed as
anencephalic cannot be aborted in the 1st trimester. Even a fetus tested by amniocentesis and found to have Tay-Sachs syndrome cannot be aborted. Both of those cases would survive outside the womb for a while but death would be imminent. A really restrictive law would mean that the family has to bear a child they know will die in their arms after a brief life of agony, of misery, of horror. This is me making a relative moral judgment about which path is better.
If abortion is legal, then at least it becomes possible to MAKE a decision consistent with one's religion and ethics and situation. With religious extremists pushing to stop all abortions anytime anywhere, one day it might happen that such a decision cannot be made. Yet when you look at that narrow life decision, you have to take into account that certain religions would allow parents to withhold medical treatment for a sick child (not a fetus, but a CHILD) because the tenets of their faith always turn to God the healer. Christian Science is one such group but not the only one. Anti-vaxxers have led to childhood deaths because they don't believe in the safety of vaccinations. A recent measles outbreak revealed that such insanity is still ongoing. Hell, the current COVID crisis with masking is another example of craziness. That fetus that becomes a child STILL isn't safe in this harsh world.
Lots of folks would love to adopt, true, but too many kids are STILL stuck in a foster system or an orphanage system because they aren't "perfect" kids. Parents want "perfect, adorable" kids but the damaged ones never make it anywhere. Pat, you had tears with your friend who had that abortion. I grieve for an old friend Arthur C. from 40 years ago who committed suicide because he was one of the "imperfect" kids that nobody wanted. He fought for a while but then life and his friends couldn't persuade him that he had incentives to live. And we cried for him, for the disdain to which he had been treated, for the hatred shown to him during his formative years.