Your comeback is supposition, a very different thing from evidence.
There wouldn't be any real evidence behind it because for that to happen someone would need to release figures and no-one would have that figure other than the government. why would they give that figure away?
That article talks about productivity but has absolutely nothing to do with loss of productivity from disability and illness. You need more than a random article that uses the word to make a case.
And you tell me to find a better article.
This accounts for people working on a "cure" not the people themselves... it shows you how loss of productivity can ensure the loss of mass amounts of money through ineffective procedures which waste money rather than ensure it is put to good use.
So yes my article is relevant - in the fact in showing you how money is wasted in companies ($69 billion).
so yes find a better article
You set a high bar for you concept of cure. Apparently in your strange world, nothing is worth doing if it isn't a complete cure.
Because the meaning for a cure is actually curing something rather than maintaining it - is that not your concept of the word cure?
It is a complex disease. What do you propose can be done for these people who have faults in the biochemistry and organ function they are born with?
It is indeed a complex disease which needs looking into a cure rather than looking for treatment. That is what needs to be done.
There is no complete cure because nobody has found one yet. Different teams work on different parts of the problem. You denigrate the lifelong work of these researchers and pretend they don't want to find a cure because it suits your jaded view of the world.
on the contrary my friend if you care to use google
many people have found natural remedies for diabetes and many illnesses and they are as cheap as a tin of beans. Trouble is you have way to much faith in government procedures hoping they will do it for you. It is called realism friend, living in a fairy tale world where people look after you and all of your whims.
http://www.naturalnews.com/042622_a...ion_scientific_oppression_natural_cures.html#
there is one story - please use Google more, I'm sure what you will find is astonishing (Before you say the phrase don't believe everything you read on the internet - try digging deeper into Royal Raymond Rife and be amazed at what you find). They don't want a cure, they want expensive treatments and always have. Sometimes it's better to be a realist.
And one more nagging question on my mind - why are all research companies for diseases and so forth, all charities and not government funded if it is for the people?
That is a big step forward from testing and treating insulin multiple times a day.
Think of it like a ladder bud, no-one cares about the steps on the way up, its the top we care about. Indeed it is a step , but i can bet you it will cost a damn sight more than normal procedures today which then again sky rockets prices of "Treatment".
Well there isn't much difference in our metabolic processes actually. Rats are a very good model.
http://personalcaretruth.com/2011/04/rats-test-results-that-dont-apply-to-humans/
Rats are a very vague source of information for human tests since their metabolisms work in a different way to ours.
Chimps may be a better solution - but even then i do not agree with it, want to test something don't use defenseless creatures. Use humans that are willing to give themselves to science.
Do you propose we start testing on humans right from concept phase of a new treatment?
Above ^
You have provided nothing to back your case and your smug arrogance makes you look a fool.
I have actually i have linked many articles and poked quite substantial holes in your articles, also your arrogance makes you look like a fool by nit picking the bad parts of my comments . try answering the whole comment such as i do.
If you have forgotten what i said earlier in my post so you don't forget to quote it. did you look into Royal Raymond Rife?
