Split Database Access FE and SQL Server BE (1 Viewer)

accessNator

Registered User.
Local time
Today, 03:08
Joined
Oct 17, 2008
Messages
132
I am currently working on an application where I am using MS access as my FE and working with linked tables to SQL server BE. I also have a few temp tables within Access that are not linked but needed.

1. What are my steps into making this into a SPLIT DB? I am assume the BE will have my linked tables from SQL and the FE will have my temp tables and forms. Is this correct?
2. Once I split it, then I can make an .ACCDE file for a Mulit User environment, is this correct?

What other steps should I be made aware of?

Thanks,
 

pbaldy

Wino Moderator
Staff member
Local time
Today, 01:08
Joined
Aug 30, 2003
Messages
36,137
It's been a while, but you can use the upsizing wizard in Access, SSMA in SQL Server, and perhaps other methods to push the tables to SQL Server. SQL Server would be the BE, there would not be a BE that had the SS linked tables in it. Yes, the FE would keep the temp tables, forms, reports, etc. Yes you can make an accde to distribute to users (and you keep the accdb for development).
 

Galaxiom

Super Moderator
Staff member
Local time
Today, 18:08
Joined
Jan 20, 2009
Messages
12,860
It is a better practice to place the Temp tables in a separate local database outside of the FE.

Code can be included in the FE to generate the temp database on demand.
 

accessNator

Registered User.
Local time
Today, 03:08
Joined
Oct 17, 2008
Messages
132
It's been a while, but you can use the upsizing wizard in Access, SSMA in SQL Server, and perhaps other methods to push the tables to SQL Server. SQL Server would be the BE, there would not be a BE that had the SS linked tables in it. Yes, the FE would keep the temp tables, forms, reports, etc. Yes you can make an accde to distribute to users (and you keep the accdb for development).

In my Access App, I already have the sql tables linked via ODBC.
So I really dont have to worry having a BE access DB correct? I can simply just create the ACCDE, correct?

Thanks,
 

accessNator

Registered User.
Local time
Today, 03:08
Joined
Oct 17, 2008
Messages
132
It is a better practice to place the Temp tables in a separate local database outside of the FE.

Code can be included in the FE to generate the temp database on demand.

I thought about that too, but I needed the TEMP tables within Access. I know its better practice from what I read but I needed those temp tables so my continuous forms have a local place temporarily. Maybe I'll revisit the code to make it more efficient. I know it may create bloat, but I have it set to compact when in use.

Thanks for your reply.
 

pbaldy

Wino Moderator
Staff member
Local time
Today, 01:08
Joined
Aug 30, 2003
Messages
36,137
Sorry, I misunderstood. If you already have the SS tables linked, you already have a split db. Yes, you should be able to create the accde now.
 

Galaxiom

Super Moderator
Staff member
Local time
Today, 18:08
Joined
Jan 20, 2009
Messages
12,860
In my Access App, I already have the sql tables linked via ODBC.
So I really dont have to worry having a BE access DB correct? I can simply just create the ACCDE, correct?

Yes. Though I would seriously consider putting the Temp tables into what I call a Side End. If you search the forum for that term you can see previous discussions about the benefits.
 

Galaxiom

Super Moderator
Staff member
Local time
Today, 18:08
Joined
Jan 20, 2009
Messages
12,860
I thought about that too, but I needed the TEMP tables within Access.

The temp tables in a Side End are linked like any Access Backend.

It avoids the bloating of the FE.
 

accessNator

Registered User.
Local time
Today, 03:08
Joined
Oct 17, 2008
Messages
132
Yes. Though I would seriously consider putting the Temp tables into what I call a Side End. If you search the forum for that term you can see previous discussions about the benefits.

Thanks for the term. I will look it up.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top Bottom