A possible scenario of the next 2 years

[The_Doc_Man]

Word meanings to a liberal are "fluid" based on relative morality and politics.

I decided to review a couple of older threads to see what I had missed. This clip showed an example of how congress can sometimes ask irrelevant questions.

The question was "Define a woman." Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson didn't answer correctly as far as Sen. Blackburn was concerned, but I have the answer that would have demonstrated the duplicity in the senator's question. The answer should have been, "When I'm acting as a judge, justice is blind. In that context I don't know what a woman is. I only know what a citizen is. Or did you wish to have prejudice introduced into law?"

 

[AccessBlaster]

The reason Judge Ketanji Brown could not answer the question, "define a woman" is obvious. Liberals put party and power above everything else including logic.

 

[moke123]

Major news over the last few days of evidence of bribery by Joe Biden, but... @ColinEssex .... You won't know about it unless you watch or read a conservative outlet like Fox because all the other networks refuse to cover it even though he may be pretty close to charges.

This is why I say it's not like I'm married to or loyal to only Fox, but I'm sorry to say if you're not reading them, you're missing a lot of what's actually going on.

If you don't know that, then fine, now you know. If you do know that and still don't read them, that tells me quite a bit as well.

You realize they only have 1 FD-1023 from someone who spoke to someone who says they have tapes.

If I called the FBI and said Isaac was planning on blowing up the world trade center they would fill out an FD-1023 which is a form used to document Unverified information.

Where's the tapes? An FD-1023 is not evidence and would be inadmissible.

 

[Steve R.]

I decided to review a couple of older threads to see what I had missed. This clip showed an example of how congress can sometimes ask irrelevant questions.

The question was "Define a woman." Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson didn't answer correctly as far as Sen. Blackburn was concerned, but I have the answer that would have demonstrated the duplicity in the senator's question. The answer should have been, "When I'm acting as a judge, justice is blind. In that context I don't know what a woman is. I only know what a citizen is. Or did you wish to have prejudice introduced into law?"

Justice may be "blind", but the hypothetical answer suggested as the appropriate response makes no sense. How can Brown hypothetically respond that she knows what a "citizen" is, but not a "woman"? As I previously wrote: "Word meanings to a liberal are "fluid" based on relative morality and politics."

Additionally, how do you even get into having "prejudice introduced into law"?
Today, we actually have prejudice induced into our legal system. One legal theme that has unfortunately caught-on is that of a "disparate" impact. It's permissible for certain groups of people to be defined as legally exempt from the consequences of breaking the law due to the law having a claimed "disparate" impact. Along those lines, the U.S. Supreme Court may soon issue a decision concerning Asian students who have been discriminated against on college admissions, even though we have laws claiming to endorse equal rights.

 

[Isaac]

Is Fox talking about the bribery? I'm surprised. I stopped watching when they fired Tucker. NewsMax is covering the story though.

Of course, the bribery remains one of the top most news coverage - especially now that there is audio proof.

 

[Isaac]

The question was "Define a woman." Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson didn't answer correctly as far as Sen. Blackburn was concerned, but I have the answer that would have demonstrated the duplicity in the senator's question. The answer should have been, "When I'm acting as a judge, justice is blind. In that context I don't know what a woman is. I only know what a citizen is. Or did you wish to have prejudice introduced into law?"

Except knowing what a woman is absolutely IS germaine to the practice of law and judicial posts.

In many jurisdictions, if 2 spouses both accuse the other of domestic violence, the "man" is automatically deemed the agressor, for reasons that are appallingly inadequate and I won't defend or explain, but you can google it.

If you can't tell what a woman is, how would that be applied?

If you can't tell what a woman is, what happens with pregnant defendants being sentenced, or custody battles in which (again, unfortunately and immorally), the woman is presumed to get custody?

 

[ColinEssex]

Major news over the last few days of evidence of bribery by Joe Biden, but... @ColinEssex .... You won't know about it unless you watch or read a conservative outlet like Fox. . . .

I'm not sure we get Fox news here, I've never seen it.
Although, I'm not surprised about bribery in US politics, I mentioned a few weeks back that it seems every politician is on the take or bribing those that matter to further their ill-gotten gains. That's why Trump will be found not guilty and will grease palms to get in the white house. Money will buy you anything in the USA and with his bottomless pit, the presidency is secured.
Col

 

[Isaac]

I'm not sure we get Fox news here, I've never seen it.
Although, I'm not surprised about bribery in US politics, I mentioned a few weeks back that it seems every politician is on the take or bribing those that matter to further their ill-gotten gains. That's why Trump will be found not guilty and will grease palms to get in the white house. Money will buy you anything in the USA and with his bottomless pit, the presidency is secured.
Col

Does it work to type in foxnews.com in your browser and hit Enter?

But Trump lost in 2020 and is losing again now? How is the presidency secured? I don't understand.

Biden, the one with arguably a lot less money, won - and is also the one winning on the legal aspects of avoiding prosecution.

Help me understand your viewpoint here?

 

[AccessBlaster]

Biden, the one with arguably a lot less money

That's debatable

 

[Isaac]

That's debatable

Yeah, now that there is so much evidence of his laundered money.

But at least less money publicly under his name

 

[ColinEssex]

Does it work to type in foxnews.com in your browser and hit Enter?

But Trump lost in 2020 and is losing again now? How is the presidency secured? I don't understand.

Biden, the one with arguably a lot less money, won - and is also the one winning on the legal aspects of avoiding prosecution.

Help me understand your viewpoint here?

Oh right, OK I thought Fox was a TV station, I didn't realise it was a website. Seems alot of hassle to look at a website just to get debatable USA biased news. I prefer the non biased BBC news.
Trump has alot of money, money talks, especially in the USA. Need I say more?
Col

 

[ColinEssex]

Fox started out as a cable news network.

I thought cable news network was the full name of CNN. So are you saying Fox is CNN? I'm confused I admit it.
Col

 

[Isaac]

non biased BBC news

 

[ColinEssex]

Thought you'd like that.
Col

 

[moke123]

Major news over the last few days of evidence of bribery by Joe Biden, but... @ColinEssex .... You won't know about it unless you watch or read a conservative outlet like Fox because all the other networks refuse to cover it even though he may be pretty close to charges.

This is why I say it's not like I'm married to or loyal to only Fox, but I'm sorry to say if you're not reading them, you're missing a lot of what's actually going on.

If you don't know that, then fine, now you know. If you do know that and still don't read them, that tells me quite a bit as well.

Republicans Acknowledge Biden Bribe Audio Might Not Exist

The alleged Joe Biden bribe was allegedly caught on tape — but nobody can say if either allegation is true.

news.yahoo.com

@ColinEssex before you run to check out Fox news take a look at an old study

Study: Watching Fox News Actually Makes You Less Informed

It’s not exactly a revelation that Fox News viewers are spectacularly ill informed about current events compared to people who watch other networks. But according to a recent report, the Fox audience knows less even than folks who don’t watch any news at all. Researchers from New Jersey’s...

www.rollingstone.com

 

[AccessBlaster]

The authors and their affiliations = praise Democrats and demonize everything else...blah blah blah.

 

[AccessBlaster]

I find this ironic

 

[Isaac]

Republicans Acknowledge Biden Bribe Audio Might Not Exist

The alleged Joe Biden bribe was allegedly caught on tape — but nobody can say if either allegation is true.

news.yahoo.com

@ColinEssex before you run to check out Fox news take a look at an old study

Study: Watching Fox News Actually Makes You Less Informed

It’s not exactly a revelation that Fox News viewers are spectacularly ill informed about current events compared to people who watch other networks. But according to a recent report, the Fox audience knows less even than folks who don’t watch any news at all. Researchers from New Jersey’s...

www.rollingstone.com

1. AHH! AHH!! STOP LOOKING AT ME MOKE!

2. That was a joke.

3. "Makes you less informed". Umm no, not "makes". Correlates with just enough % of people who ARE ill informed that it sparks the conclusion "makes" but only for people who confuse correlation with causation. I read multiple news sources and can confirm that Fox is generally the one that tells you the things nobody else will. The reverse is not true. CNN does not generally tell me useful things that Fox does not. And Rolling Stone? C'mon. I'm pretty sure their choice of selection of which news events were "worthy" of testing their study subjects just MIGHT have something to do with something. Of course I can go out and test a bunch of liberals about the Biden bribery event and claim they are all dumber for not knowing, too. Two can play that game! And a game it is.

4. Re: the audio tape. Okay, so basically we're at just the level of certainty of all the Democrat hoaxes right???

PS. Always remember, it's the people who DON'T watch Fox News who think that things like "patriarchal male absolutionist" and "intersectional non gender-y celestial being" are actually real things.

 

[ColinEssex]

I think I've got it sorted now, thanks to Pat.
Pat said get Fox through Google, so it must be Web based news channel. I can't get it on my TV channel listing, but I can get CNN. Pat said, (and we know she tells the truth,) Fox news is Cable News Network, so according to Pat, Fox and CNN are the same news channel, therefore, being as CNN stands for Cable News Network, it proves they must be the same. Its just that one is web based and the other is available on Cable TV like I have. Two names, same TV channel.
Sorted.
Col

 

[Steve R.]

Fox and CNN are the same news channel,

Fox News and CNN are two independent news channels. CNN does stand for Cable News Network, but it should not be conflated to being a source to see all news on cable. Fox News is evidently available on-line. Link --->: https://www.foxnews.com/go. I suspect that you would have to pay for it, You may also be able to get Fox News through Roku. We get Fox News as part of HULU of our subscription, which you may also be able to subscribe to.