Glad to see progress in the fight against the New, Anti-White, Racism

I watched an episode of Columbo recently. In it they referred to females as 'broads', not heard that one before.

OK, let's start by acknowledging that many derogatory statements have been made by people of less politeness... the word "uncouth" comes to mind. Heck, Col, I've even referred to you as "uncouth" at times - but today that is NOT the case. I'll partly answer the implied question.

According to my now-deceased uncle who saw many USA political changes in his youth, the term "broad" has been around a long time. He thought it might have started around the same time as the Women's Suffrage movement - 1911 or thereabouts. He said it related to the fact that a woman's hips are broader than a man's hips, and when women stopped wearing 10,000 layers of hoop skirts (a slight exaggeration on my part perhaps) and switched to more form-fitting dresses, you could more easily see the general shape of the broader hips.

The presence of women in the military in WW 2 may have exacerbated the use of "broad" as for example, the women of the US Marine Corps (most often nurses and clerical workers) were often called BAMs - for "broad-axle Marines" (polite version). The less polite version substitutes something else for "axle" though the substitute ALSO begins with an "A" and in the common British version, ends with an "E".
 
There you go playing the victim again :poop: Just remember, it is your choice.
I've honestly got no idea what you're talking about. My choice? Of what?
Why not try English instead of trying to be subtle and failing miserably. If you've got something to say then spit it out.
Col
 
Doc, it's a well known fact that as women get older, their 'hips' become larger (or broader), especially if they've had a sprog (child). Some women can't sit in an airline seat, they book two.
I'd better not go on, you know how sensitive women here can be.
Col
 
Discretion is the better part of valor. Perhaps that topic, broad as it is, would best be left for others to continue the debate.
 
Looks like you went to school in Baltimore because not only can Johnny not read, but Colin can't read either.
May I ask you to explain this comment please?
I've heard of Baltimore, no idea why you mention it.
Who is Johnny? I've heard of Johnny Carson but I suspect you are referring to the word 'Johnny' as being an English slang word for a condom.
As for the reading reference, - total mystery.
Col
 
Discretion is the better part of valor. Perhaps that topic, broad as it is, would best be left for others to continue the debate.
Yes I agree. Women are very good at reading things into a comment and getting it wrong.
Col
 
Doc, it's a well known fact that as women get older, their 'hips' become larger (or broader), especially if they've had a sprog (child). Some women can't sit in an airline seat, they book two.
I'd better not go on, you know how sensitive women here can be.
Col

I was actually referring to differences in the pelvic bones as a starting point. I've probably been watching too many police-related TV shows dealing with partially decomposed bodies where the first question was "man or woman" and the pelvic bones figured prominently in the response.
 
I have a friend who lived in Detroit for a while. She says a real estate agent approached her. A black family had made an offer on a house in the neighbourhood. The real estate agent was putting together a buying group of the neighbourhood's owners to outbid the black family. So not some law of the land, not some government overreach here, but white people, the majority of Americans, banding together with the assistance of white moneyed professionals, and story by story, individual case by individual case, tilting the landscape of the whole social fabric to remove opportunity from a certain subgroup.

I made a conscious decision when I was young that I would never be poor so I am not.
And the colour of your skin? Irrelevant to your success in this matter? Irrelevant to the degree of effort required to not fall into despair in the face of setbacks? What if the whole tilt of the social fabric leaned against you?
 
1688670348961.png
 
I have a friend who lived in Detroit for a while. She says a real estate agent approached her. A black family had made an offer on a house in the neighbourhood. The real estate agent was putting together a buying group of the neighbourhood's owners to outbid the black family. So not some law of the land, not some government overreach here, but white people, the majority of Americans, banding together with the assistance of white moneyed professionals, and story by story, individual case by individual case, tilting the landscape of the whole social fabric to remove opportunity from a certain subgroup.
The "friend" ploy. Your story may or may not be authentic. Consider the simple fact that some Blacks are racist. So for every assertion of supposed White racism, an example of Black racism can also be dug-up. This can lead to an endless loop of recriminations.

PS: As @AccessBlaster blaster has pointed out, 78% of the residents of Detroit are black. The assertion that the majority of Americans are White, is rapidly becoming a fabrication. Also note, that many urban areas are managed by the Black community, so it becomes absurd to assert that all the ills in a Black run community are due to evil White people. The Black community needs to look into the mirror.

As for the "white moneyed professionals", they are falling over-themselves consumed with maniacal suicidal White guilt shoveling their money to grifting organizations such as BLM, hoping for an absolution that will never be granted by the radical left.
 
While, unlike "Johnny", I am sure you can actually read, but you have this really bad habit of assuming something different than what was said. And it is not just me that you choose to misunderstand. So, maybe you can't read or you do it to start fights.
I dont assume something different. I read something different because the writer (usually a Yank) can't seem to write something that is clear.
An example being your tome about being poor etc etc. That could have been easily covered in one statement, but no, you drone on as if you are something spectacular. Your experience is nothing new, millions of people go from rags to riches. Maybe i did. Also previously in another thread you brag about having a nanny to bring up your daughter, but the way you phrased it gave the impression you paid her the minimum so she had to resort to a second job. Link it all together and like Cassius Clay, you seem to be bragging 'I'm the greatest'. I've news for you, despite the 'super' tag under your name, you are just normal like the rest of us.
Then to squirm out of it, you then accuse me of being a 'victim' and despite me being a foreigner, you use phrases and words well known in the USA but unknown outside the white picket fence of your borders. You then accuse me when I ask for clarification.
Col
.
 
Pat: So it is your assertion that when black families move into white neighbourhoods, and those black families don't SOUND black, then real estate values do not drop? Is that your assertion?
AccessBlaster: Now do Grosse Pointe.
Steve R: No ploy.
 
If (as Pat says) discrimination happened in the past but is not common today. Why then Pat, do you refer to a 'white' neighbourhood and a 'black' neighbourhood? Surely that is racial discrimination? Why don't you just have 'neighbourhoods'? What has a person's colour got to do with it?

I suppose if one is white and wealthy (not poor) one would live in an area where it would be too expensive for black people to live, so that would give the impression that discrimination is not common.
Col
 
Your ignorance is showing as well as your downright mean spirit. And let's not forget that old aphorism about people who live in glass houses not throwing stones.


For exactly the same reason that we have Americans and "African-Americans" and Congress has a "Black cacacus" but not a "White cacacus". The left pushes very hard for segregation and victimhood and reparations and any other thing that can possibly divide "Americans".
Sorry, I thought you were talking about USA discrimination. Yes, Some British police are racist, especially the London Metropolitan police.
What was it you wanted to say about British discrimination? I'm happy to answer, despite my ignorance and mean spirit.
So American discrimination is propagated by left wing politicians, not the people. Interesting.
Col
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom