Historically people used accents to interpret heritage and you were trusted or not based on that accent... I guess the implication being that if you had that accent you'd spent significant amounts of time in that area.
Still probably the best way of "guessing" the background of someone...
No probs. He applied for and got US citizenship when he was 17. Sounds to me like he regarded himself as AmericanSorry Rabbie I'd picked up 17 somewhere along the lines
Hey there's nothing wrong with Fauldhouse
Is the UK not part of 'the West' now, then? I grew up using 'jumper' for what North Americans call a 'sweater'.The Japanese for example still use English words that haven't been used in the West since the 1940s ("jumper" instead of sweater or jacket).
To be precise, he left when he was about 4. He became a US citizen at 17. I can't find any reference to how he 'never looked back', so if you could provide links that would be a help.Bob Hope was born in England but he went to America when he was 17 and never looked back. If someone is born in one country but spent 60 years living in another (including becoming a citizen of that country), can the first country still claim him as one of their own?
Here's tae usLOL, you're right, it's a good place to come from ha ha ha. Maybe not a good place to go to...
I jest, but they do have rather thick accents. That's thick as in pronounced, not thick as in they sound, ah, never mind, take it as it comes lol.
Here's tae us
wha's like us
damn few
and they're a' deid
I would be worried if you were deid and still postingam no deid yit!![]()
I would be worried if you were deid and still posting![]()
As for your question, in my opinion, yes. If you're born in one country, that's your nationality, regardless of whether or not you change your citizenship. There's nothing you can do to alter the fact that you were born in one particular place as opposed to another.
Then I misunderstood the original question. I thought it was to do with can a country correctly claim that a person comes from there, even if he/she has lived somewhere else for a long time. To that, I said that I thought they could, feelings don't enter into it. If the question was to do where the person feels at home, my answer might have been different.Doesn't it really just come down to where the individual feels is 'home'?
Then I misunderstood the original question. I thought it was to do with can a country correctly claim that a person comes from there, even if he/she has lived somewhere else for a long time. To that, I said that I thought they could, feelings don't enter into it. If the question was to do where the person feels at home, my answer might have been different.
I currently live in Canada, having moved here in 2003, when I was 32. I'm not Canadian. I could live here for the rest of my life and I would never be Canadian. I could stamp my feet and insist how much I love maple syrup and ice hockey, but I would still not be from Canada.
I 'll probably never find out, but I am mildly curious. I'll definitey never take the pledge. I decided a while back that I'm not here because I love the place, but because I love my wife and she's Canadian. Given the choice, I'd go back to the UK in a flash.Have you checked out the naturalisation process in Canada? Would be interesting to see what pledges etc are required and whether you agree with them.
I agree with you both, as far as how the person feels. I wasn't saying that Bob Hope didn't feel American, I'm sure he did. I was taking issue with the suggestion that because someone chooses to live somewhere else, you can no longer say that they come from their birthplace. Bob Hope did a lot of great work for the US. He clearly saw his adopted home as a great place. Good luck to anyone who feels the same. However, he was still from the UK originally, so I feel that anyone who says he was British is correct.Rabbie said:I think Dan-cat sums it very neatly by linking it to where a person feels at home.
I 'll probably never find out, but I am mildly curious. I'll definitey never take the pledge. I decided a while back that I'm not here because I love the place, but because I love my wife and she's Canadian. Given the choice, I'd go back to the UK in a flash.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not looking at the UK through rose-tinted glasses. I'm well aware of the various problems and faults the UK has, but having experienced and weighed up the advantages and disadvantages of living in both countries, I'd rather be back in Britain.
I can make a prediction:It would be fascinating to find out whether this view softens over time. Not that it's wrong. Just that whether or not someone can start to 'feel' the nationality that they have permanently moved into after a time.
We'll have another talk about it in five years time. See where we are.![]()