Recent content by Kodo

http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.drawing.printing.printdocument.printpage.aspx

You can't update/insert a primary key (unique) value. Remove those parameters from your query.

www.4guysfromrolla.com is a great place also, visit scott guthrie's blog http://weblogs.asp.net/scottgu/ *shamless plug* and of course www.learnvisualstudio.net

There are a lot of concepts to understand and at the core of it all is Data Access and Data Binding. www.4guysfromrolla.com is a good place to hit some free tutorials. of course there's www.asp.net too. and if you're willing to spend a bit to learn : www.learnvisualstudio.net

Yes, that's my Boss's name ;)

Don't store the folder name along with the path to the image.. just the image name. This way if you change the path, then you don't need to change any records. so you'll just append the path onto the value for the src..like: <img src="/images/<%=RS("PicFile") %>" /> make sense?

you can't do a request.form after your upload a file.. what control are you using to upload the file? when you generate your table, the src for the images should be the name of the field in the db that holds your location. RS("PicFile") Where RS is your recordset object.

<shameless plug> www.learnvisualstudio.net </shameless plug>

I hate getting into things like this.. but that can't possibly be a robust, code maintainable and long lasting code sustainable architecture. Remember , you can have 2 of the 3: Quick, Cheap, Good I'm not so sure I'd want anyone to build me a web site who didn't have a good understanding of...

Mono Project

so far so good.. now you just have to place that location as the src value of an image :) <img src="/images/pic.jpg" /> like so:) Or use an ASP.NET image control and bind the ImageUrl property to the location of the image. (this is preferred over using the plain HTML image tag)

The files need to be relative to the site.. not physical paths. something like /images/ImageName.jpg

http://www.microsoft.com/business/vb2005upgrade/default.mspx

I have to take issue with this.. VS 2005 does a great job of supporting standards and I've yet to build a web site in it that didn't work to my design in IE or FireFox. The next release of VS (Orcas) is even better!

Dreamweaver is more a designers tool.. Visual Web Dev is a programmers tool. So if you are a programmer, you'll probably find VWD more appealing and vice versa. In case you're interested. We have a new site up www.learnexpression.com which hosts free videos on Microsofts Expression product...