Search results

No one here possesses anything that could affect the outcome, unless you know Jack and have info on his activities. Everything I have is public information. You could visit the courthouse and request the file. I just have the means to access it electronically. Besides if I posted the chat log...

The litigation is only a few months old. Probably wont reach trial for another year if it gets that far. From just the little info I read there's a good chance he'll look for a deal. These cases can drag out when you have forensic experts to challenge their experts, psych experts for...

Your field size is set to 50. Increase it to 255.

Believe it or not there are a lot of laws which protect sex offenders so I know to be careful about disclosure. Trial looks to be scheduled for November but that always gets continued out.

You need an account to access federal records. I can't post it here but they have the log of a video conferencing app with him talking to the mother in the Philippines. He makes some damning admissions.

WOW! Just read the 59 page summary of the investigation. Worse than you can ever imagine. I've had my fair share of kiddie diddlers so not a lot shocks me. But WOW.

I doubt he's being held. More likely released with conditions such as no unsupervised contact with kids under 18, No or limited access to computers and internet, etc...

Your preaching to the choir, my friend. I'm pretty sure I'm the only one on here who has legally seen kiddie porn. I doubt the case file will be sealed so I'll eventually be able to see the pleadings.

I'm more intrigued by the fact that the feds kept it. They usually pass small stuff down to the states. There isn't much on Pacer yet, so not a lot of details.

Jack's Indictment:

You do know it's legal in several states, right? It was legal in Connecticut up until 2 or 3 years ago.

The problem with that law is that many, if not most, trafficking arrest are the result of LE stings. There is no "Victim" per se. Just responding or agreeing to a meet is sufficient for arrest, even if there was no actual intent to meet.

Why are the dolphins illegal and what are they going to do with the minors? :unsure:

More likely their Cell Phone. In Jack's case I'd be most concerned with the charge of "Attempted Production" That carries some harsh time. Possession charges sometimes do have some solid defenses. "It was in a zip file I downloaded from a coding forum" :rolleyes: I've seen numerous cases of...

I'm somewhat surprised we didn't get a "This domain has been seized.." type message from UA. I'm sure someone was tasked with looking at every upload to UA.

You could probably iterate through all the fields on the form and test the value against the .oldvalue property. something like Dim ctl As Control For Each ctl In Me.Controls If ctl.ControlType = acTextBox Then If ctl.Value <> ctl.OldValue Then...

https://www.pcgamer.com/software/ai/i-destroyed-months-of-your-work-in-seconds-says-ai-coding-tool-after-deleting-a-devs-entire-database-during-a-code-freeze-i-panicked-instead-of-thinking/ Scary to think AI has access to things like the social security databases.

I was kind of planning on being really late to my funeral

https://www.axios.com/2025/05/28/ai-jobs-white-collar-unemployment-anthropic

When you don't notice the date and read through a few pages only to find that its a 10 year old thread.