Yes. A law is a law. When we decide that we no longer believe in a law, it should be retired. That keeps the criminal code clean. Right now it is a mess and gives the party in power the ability to enforce old, archaic laws against people they don't like because they are still there.
Let us not forget using the WH and FBI to pressure social media companies to violate our first amendment rights by suppressing posts that disagreed from the government version of "truth". And pretty much all of DJT's rights, especially the 1st, 4th, and 8th.
I'm sure I have also. You of all people should be in favor of removing outdated laws. Or maybe you like having them on the books so they can be used against people you don't like.
No, he just wanted me to either lie, in which case he would call me a liar or confess to probably being a criminal
Not amusing but I let it pass.
Once again you missed the point. Pat was commenting that the Ag should enforce an 1864 law because it's her job, failing to know that Ag's and DA's have wide discretion on what cases to bring.
No kidding. That "discretion" has been liberally used to contort the law by Democrats to file (phony) civil and criminal cases against Trump, such as the deranged attempt to use the 14th Amendment. Not to also mention that "discretion" has been used to avoid filing charges against Democrats, such as Biden and Hillary.
Right, and you tried, and failed, to compare that to some dumb laws nobody wants enforced
