Are these things true?

Isaac

Isaac

Lifelong Learner
Local time
Today, 14:10
Joined
Mar 14, 2017
Messages
11,698
"Think of it, a modestly successful comedian, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, talked the United States of America into spending $350 Billion Dollars, to go into a War that couldn’t be won, that never had to start, but a War that he, without the U.S. and "TRUMP," will never be able to settle," Trump wrote in a scathing rebuke Wednesday morning,

"The United States has spent $200 Billion Dollars more than Europe, and Europe's money is guaranteed, while the United States will get nothing back.

"Why didn't Sleepy Joe Biden demand Equalization, in that this War is far more important to Europe than it is to us — We have a big, beautiful Ocean as separation.

"On top of this, Zelenskyy admits that half of the money we sent him is 'MISSING.'
Click to expand...

Interestingly, Trump brings up a number of things the mainstream media will not mention, and portrays a certain perspective, you can call it "Russan propoganda" or not, but are any of those claims not substantially true? If not, why?
 
Read this post in context with my other post, Free Speech. I've read cnn from top to bottom, and as I asserted in my other thread I started today, most of the things they rate as 'false' , really aren't false.

- the 'who started the war' I already dealt with in my other post, it's subjective
- the 4% rating could be based on any particular poll, CNN tried to debunk it by mentioning one at random - hardly persuasive
- the missing money is a matter of semantics. Trump says he admits it is missing, CNN says oh it's not missing, rather, "doesn’t know where all the professed additional money has gone". I'll leave you to figure that one out yourself.

The 350 billion number, I have no idea. CNN says it's false, but I don't trust their assertion with no evidence, nor do I trust Trump's.

I do know the parliament itself says that the US has given far more than the EU.
Do you trust CNN over the EU's own figures??

So the question isn't really have I turned on the TV today (I don't watch tv anyway), it's "how many blind assertions are you willing to believe to even make it through that CNN article with zero evidence?"
 
Last edited:
Pat Hartman said:
Zelenskyy has canceled elections yet again. Why? He has no local support and would lose hands down.
Click to expand...
Under Ukraine’s constitution, it is not legal to hold national elections during a period of martial law.
 
moke123 said:
Under Ukraine’s constitution, it is not legal to hold national elections during a period of martial law.
Click to expand...
Right so indirectly by declaring martial law what do you suppose he did? It's the same thing just said differently
 
1740345181810.jpeg
 
Pat Hartman said:
Lies, Lies, and damn lies.
Click to expand...

Similar to Mark Twain's quote - which I have to update.

There are lies, damned lies, statistics, ... and political promises from progressive liberals. But of course, Mark Twain couldn't have said the last part because the progressive liberals hadn't shown their ugly faces yet.
 
moke123 said:
which ones?
Click to expand...
I've made several posts recently, new threads in fact, which demonstrate this phenomena. You can look at them for yourself. They have to do with CNN saying things are false that aren't really false, like so-called debunking
 
Pat Hartman said:
Really? Are we going to rehash the bogus lawsuits and impeachments from the past EIGHT years? Let us remember it was Hillary and her election campaign who were fined over $100,000 for the lie of the Steele dossier and which the FBI itself had to distance itself from due to its inability to verify "facts". Trump ON VIDEO TAPE on Charlottesville clarifying his statement in real time and people are STILL LYING about that one. The staged photos implying that the office of a Billionaire had papers all over the floor of his office which were marked "secret".

This isn't even remotely amusing moke.
Click to expand...
As I said, they try to drown you in evidence requests for widely stipulated known truths. It's a major tactic.
 
www.msnbc.com

Supreme Court to hear arguments in straight woman’s 'reverse' discrimination appeal

As the White House targets DEI initiatives, the justices will consider the rules for bringing employment discrimination claims.
www.msnbc.com www.msnbc.com

It's amazing to me that they even have to question the simple principle that you can't discriminate against anybody, yes including white people and straight people, on the basis of race or protected class.

DEI has always been a way of just solving the problem of past discrimination by implementing MORE discrimination going in the other direction, which was always an incredibly stupid idea that was highly unlikely to be abided by citizens.

It's not reverse discrimination - it's just discrimination!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top Bottom