Are you an atheist?

[Frothingslosh]

Yeah, it should, good catch.

 

[Vassago]

Frackin' liberal way, destroy everybody who don't think like they do especially the Christians.

You keep throwing around this liberal thing, which seems to be typical when a reasonable response cannot be given. I don't really understand your position. Do you think it's ok, or rather should be ok, to turn away customers because of their orientation? It's already against the law in Oregon. I just want to know your opinion.

Keeping in mind, "What would Jesus do?"

 

[Vassago]

If it had been a cake (routine) in the bakery, it would have been sold to them. It was a very special cake. The owner stated: "We sat down with the owner, Jack Phillips. And within a couple of moments he asked me if the cake was for us, and we told him that it was, and he then told us he would not make a cake for a same-sex wedding." Let me repeat that for all you liberals out there that want to change the words to fit your agenda. SAME_SEX MARRIAGE.

I didn't understand the flavor of cake having anything to do with anything, so I'm just going to skip that part until you have a better way of explaining what you mean.

If a straight couple had gone it to buy the cake for a same-sex wedding, he probably would have made it without even asking who's wedding the cake is for. He chose his opinion based on the fact that they were same sex. THIS falls under discrimination.

I wonder if he would have asked the straight couple if the woman was a virgin and refused the cake if she actually answered "no." I can almost promise you he wouldn't, yet that would also be against God's will, no?

 

[Vassago]

I also want to point out now after actually reading over the JUDGE'S ruling in the Oregon case rather than relying on FAUX News for all of my information, it wasn't just about refusing to bake the cake, it was about the trauma suffered AFTER. When the couple filed the complaint, the baker decided to publish and ridicule the couple on facebook, even posting their address and contact information for everyone on his friend's list to harrass. Very "Christ-like", right? Because of this, they received a lot of prank calls, hate mail, death threats, threats against their adopted children, and many other heinous actions. Keep in mind, they NEVER went public and refused any interviews. They wanted this to stay private. It was the baker who decided to make the story public and do interviews immediately after finding out they had filed the complaint. It was the baker's own fault everything that happened to both them and the couple after the posts were made on Facebook.

 

[Frothingslosh]

Sounds like typical American Christian behavior to me.

I'm sure Blade will find some way to blame the Great Liberal Conspiracy, though. Guy makes Infowars look reasonable.

 

[Bladerunner]

You know, watching Blade's descent into delusion and paranoia is quite interesting, the way he projects onto liberals his own political intentions and desires.

What Blade (intentionally, I'm sure) left out of the LA cake thing was that, while the second cake request was for an ISIS flag, the employee who took the order and made the cake had no idea what that flag was, and would have rejected the order had they known.

Also, I know the guy. He's an acquaintance of my best friend, and very nearly a clone of Blade.

Don't know about the LA Cake thingy.............???????\

DId I do something I should not have>>>???????

 

[Bladerunner]

Exactly. I'm sure they would have also rejected making a cake for a same sex wedding if it had been for a heterosexual couple.

Boy Howdy,,,you got me there Galaxiom,,,heterosexual same-sex wedding???????

 

[Bladerunner]

You really need to get over this lying habit, Blade. You are yet again intentionally misrepresenting Matthew 9, just like you did last week.

Of course, this is far from the first time you've deliberately misrepresented something here, so I really shouldn't be surprised.

Just out of curiosity, wasn't there even some special law supposedly engraved on some stone tablets saying something about lying?

Matthew 9: 4,6 ......are part of the post,,,,, How am I lying, I am simply lsetting it tell those who read it, what God and Jesus thinks about Homosexuality or Gay as the Modern word for it is...........I cannot help it because you can not interpret it.... You do know that so far you have made the wrong choice,,,,, a terrible consequence for such a simple choice.

 

[Bladerunner]

Shouldn't it be Matthew chapter 19 4:6 ?

Don't know about the first reference but it's not 9:3,8

Brian

Thank you,,,Yes it should be Matthew 19: 4,6.......... typo error.......Thanks for your help.

 

[Frothingslosh]

Matthew 9: 4,6 ......are part of the post,,,,, How am I lying, I am simply lsetting it tell those who read it, what God and Jesus thinks about Homosexuality or Gay as the Modern word for it is...........I cannot help it because you can not interpret it.... You do know that so far you have made the wrong choice,,,,, a terrible consequence for such a simple choice.

Do you even realize when you lie any more? Maybe it's just unconscious, and you start babbling incoherently like this because deep down you know you're lying and just can't admit it.

I debunked your lie that this is about gay marriage or even homosexuality at all last week when you made this same exact lie, simply by posting the ENTIRE verse rather than your carefully cherry-picked and misrepresented portion of it.

 

[Galaxiom]

Blade // it is just my belief but the liberals of this country are trying to force everybody to think as they do or ELSE.//

You object to the legalisation of same sex marriage.

Isn't that clearly case of the religious trying to force their way of "thinking" on everyone else?

 

[Galaxiom]

it is just my belief but the liberals of this country are trying to force everybody to think as they do or ELSE.

You object to the legalisation of same sex marriage.

Isn't that a clear case of the religious trying to force their way of "thinking" on everyone else?

 

[Bladerunner]

I didn't understand the flavor of cake having anything to do with anything, so I'm just going to skip that part until you have a better way of explaining what you mean.

If a straight couple had gone it to buy the cake for a same-sex wedding, he probably would have made it without even asking who's wedding the cake is for. He chose his opinion based on the fact that they were same sex. THIS falls under discrimination.

I wonder if he would have asked the straight couple if the woman was a virgin and refused the cake if she actually answered "no." I can almost promise you he wouldn't, yet that would also be against God's will, no?

The cake was a special cake for Their wedding!

I guess now is as good as time to hash it out. Your argument above is going to be the same argument when a same-sex couple wants to be married in a Church (any church). YEs,,,,,,,So this is just a prelude to what is coming!

 

[Bladerunner]

I also want to point out now after actually reading over the JUDGE'S ruling in the Oregon case rather than relying on FAUX News for all of my information, it wasn't just about refusing to bake the cake, it was about the trauma suffered AFTER. When the couple filed the complaint, the baker decided to publish and ridicule the couple on facebook, even posting their address and contact information for everyone on his friend's list to harrass. Very "Christ-like", right? Because of this, they received a lot of prank calls, hate mail, death threats, threats against their adopted children, and many other heinous actions. Keep in mind, they NEVER went public and refused any interviews. They wanted this to stay private. It was the baker who decided to make the story public and do interviews immediately after finding out they had filed the complaint. It was the baker's own fault everything that happened to both them and the couple after the posts were made on Facebook.

'

I guess you and the other liberals had rather keep everything quite so nobody will know!>........ What is wrong here,,,,,,,,,, really transparent aren't we.

It goes to trial in Colorado,,,,,,,guess we will just have to wait and see. Of course we already know the outcome with a frickin liberal judge and all. Its ok,,,,,,This too was preordained.

 

[Bladerunner]

Do you even realize when you lie any more? Maybe it's just unconscious, and you start babbling incoherently like this because deep down you know you're lying and just can't admit it.

I debunked your lie that this is about gay marriage or even homosexuality at all last week when you made this same exact lie, simply by posting the ENTIRE verse rather than your carefully cherry-picked and misrepresented portion of it.

Of course it is about "GAY" homosextual marriage.What have we been talking about Frothy. Please catch up,,,,,,,,,,,,

As long as they leave the churches alone, all will be well.

 

[Bladerunner]

Blade // it is just my belief but the liberals of this country are trying to force everybody to think as they do or ELSE.//

You object to the legalisation of same sex marriage.

Isn't that a clear case of the religious trying to force their way of "thinking" on everyone else?

Wrong, I objected to 5-6 supreme court dictatorial judges who legislated from the bench and made the laws for fifty states over and above the peoples laws.

Same sex marriage was already on it way in,...It is just the fricking stupid ass judges decided to hurry it up and in doing so bypassed the constitution and everything else.

WHat is next from them........

 

[Galaxiom]

Boy Howdy,,,you got me there Galaxiom,,,heterosexual same-sex wedding???????

Note the emoticon I used. = Sarcastic

You claim you are not discriminating against gays, just same sex marriage. Think about it.

 

[Galaxiom]

Wrong, I objected to 5-6 supreme court dictatorial judges who legislated from the bench and made the laws for fifty states over and above the peoples laws.

No. They didn't actually change anything. They upheld the existing constitution. It has always been unconstitutional to deny marriage to same sex couples. Any law that prevented it was already unconstitutional.

Besides, over sixty percent of the people already support same sex marriage.

 

[Bladerunner]

No. They didn't actually change anything. They upheld the existing constitution. It has always been unconstitutional to deny marriage to same sex couples. Any law that prevented it was already unconstitutional.

Besides, over sixty percent of the people already support same sex marriage.

What ever?????????/

 

[Bladerunner]

Note the emoticon I used. = Sarcastic

You claim you are not discriminating against gays, just same sex marriage. Think about it.

It is a Sin in God's eyes and I will not accept it , Period (Matthew 19:4,6)

If they want to get married via a Government run clerks or from another church/clergy who does not believe it is a sin (there will be many false Gods, prophets, Mathew 24: 23, 24), After all it is their life....their Choice. I can even tolerate them living in the neighborhood. I mean after all they are people and deserve all the respect afforded to any other person.

You'all can rant and rave about what I have said but There is not other way to say it in my opinion and it is not going to change no more than you (liberal Atheist)'s choice is going to change. We all will just have to live with current situations the best we can.













Question, If you take a poll of acceptable lifestyles say in San Francisco (or any large city) and get 60% Yes, Do you extend this to the rest of the country... Come to TN and ask that question throughout the state. Bet the results would be a little different.