You've got some weird joins still.
TeamMembers has 2 lines coming from it. The only relationship it should have should be to the TeamMakeup field. Also, TeamId shouldn't be a primary key in the TeamMakeup table. Since this table handles a many to many relationship, in my opinion it doesn't need one.
The TeamId field in TeamName connects to the CityBorough field in the City table--that just doesn't sound right. It seems there would be a one to many relationship between city and team which means you would probably need another table like CityTeams which is similar in structure and function to the TeamMakeup table you added.
A lot of links to/from the City table use the CityBorough field which isn't a primary key. Connections to the City table should probably be doing so via the MC City field.
Weeks essentially connects to the City table on 2 fields: Directly via Wave and indirectly via Borough (it goes through Activities to make this connection), that too doesn't seem right. Weeks should probably not be connected to one of those tables.
TeamMembers has 2 lines coming from it. The only relationship it should have should be to the TeamMakeup field. Also, TeamId shouldn't be a primary key in the TeamMakeup table. Since this table handles a many to many relationship, in my opinion it doesn't need one.
The TeamId field in TeamName connects to the CityBorough field in the City table--that just doesn't sound right. It seems there would be a one to many relationship between city and team which means you would probably need another table like CityTeams which is similar in structure and function to the TeamMakeup table you added.
A lot of links to/from the City table use the CityBorough field which isn't a primary key. Connections to the City table should probably be doing so via the MC City field.
Weeks essentially connects to the City table on 2 fields: Directly via Wave and indirectly via Borough (it goes through Activities to make this connection), that too doesn't seem right. Weeks should probably not be connected to one of those tables.