DEI (1 Viewer)

[Isaac]

This is the exact and precise result of dei and it's a great example of why dei was discriminatory, racist, and had to go. A unanimous supreme Court agrees

Supreme Court revives straight woman's workplace discrimination claim

Marlean Ames argued she faced too high a legal burden in pressing her claim after being passed over and demoted in favor of a lesbian and a gay man.

www.msnbc.com

 

[NauticalGent]

lol, here we go...!

 

[Pat Hartman]

The Supreme Court needs to start enforcing the Constitution instead of making law. It's about time they stopped their support for "reverse" discrimination.

 

[The_Doc_Man]

I've been following SCOTUS decisions for a while now and I have come to a sort of recognition. I am NOT trying to excuse them because they have had MANY opportunities to foul up the works and have not allowed all such opportunities to pass. However,...

SCOTUS has limited power of original review. They can't make a decision without a case having been submitted, and a large part of their cases are less than ideal for some of the decisions they are asked to make.

It has been rare for them to get such clear-cut cases, but they got two of them this week. First was the "reverse discrimination" case, which went 9-0 in leveling the playing field. Second was the firearm manufacturers who were being sued because someone used a USA-made gun to commit a crime in Mexico but the gun wasn't bought directly from the gun maker by the cartel.

A lot of the cases they have been tossing are based on "lawfare" - when the Libs file suit after suit in hope of clogging up the judicial cloaca. Which they are doing. If SCOTUS rules against nation-wide injunctions from lower courts, a lot MORE of these suits will be filed in each appellate district hoping to get nation-wide coverage.

 

[Pat Hartman]

If SCOTUS rules against nation-wide injunctions from lower courts, a lot MORE of these suits will be filed in each appellate district hoping to get nation-wide coverage.

However, if SCOTUS rules that the President gets to run the country without the help of ANY judges and nationwide injunctions, then they should be able to stop this in its tracks. NO COURT that tries to enjoin the President from carrying out his normal duties will succeed.

 

[The_Doc_Man]

NO COURT that tries to enjoin the President from carrying out his normal duties will succeed.

That isn't the problem. It is how often they will try - and in so doing, bollix up the court dockets.