Democrats hacking the immigration system to get more votes

[Isaac]

Biden's 'parole in place' immigration plan could transform lives — and the 2024 election

Some 60,000 immigrants married to U.S. citizens and eligible for the parole in place program live in swing states. In Arizona, "people are paying attention," one community activist said,

www.nbcnews.com

 

[Steve R.]

This morning Fox News had Nicole Malliotakis (R, NY) on to discuss illegal immigrants and voting. She, of course, noted that illegal immigrants can't vote. Democrats of course point out with great fanfare and bluster that illegal immigrants can't vote which makes it a non-issue. But Malliotakis went on to note that Democrats make it easy for illegal immigrants to (fraudulently) register to vote. An illegal immigrant, on government documentation can simply check the US citizenship box and the government is not allowed to actually question that person's citizenship status. So they get to vote, even-though they are not supposed to. Democrats claim to want the election process to have a integrity, yet they obstruct all attempts to clean-up the voting roles and to prevent verifying whether the person voting is actually eligible to vote.

As an editorial aside, Democrats periodically raise the issue that the voting age be reduced (16 years?). Of course the claim by Democrats is that this improves the democratic voting process. Lowering the voting age is a disguised attempt by the Democrats to "fix" the election process in their favor. Younger voters have a tendency to vote for the Democratic party as young voters are more idealistic. The quote from Churchill: “Any man under 30 who is not a liberal has no heart, and any man over thirty who is not a conservative has no brains.” Republicans, if they where smart, should propose to raise the voting age to at least 25.

 

[moke123]

Democrats periodically raise the issue that the voting age be reduced (16 years?).

Didn't the serial sofa offender just advocate for babies to have the right to vote through their parents?

 

[Isaac]

Didn't the serial sofa offender just advocate for babies to have the right to vote through their parents?

So what? through their parents is a lot different than voting themselves.

Raise the voting age, give parents a stronger voice, sounds like a good plan

 

[Isaac]

This morning Fox News had Nicole Malliotakis (R, NY) on to discuss illegal immigrants and voting. She, of course, noted that illegal immigrants can't vote. Democrats of course point out with great fanfare and bluster that illegal immigrants can't vote which makes it a non-issue. But Malliotakis went on to note that Democrats make it easy for illegal immigrants to (fraudulently) register to vote. An illegal immigrant, on government documentation can simply check the US citizenship box and the government is not allowed to actually question that person's citizenship status. So they get to vote, even-though they are not supposed to.

Arizona has tried their best to correct this problem, but have been stymied all the way by people who WANT them to be able to just 'check a box' with no proof'. Now it's got to the supreme court and MSM is running misleading headlines such as, "Republicans want to remove the right to vote from 40,000 people". No, it's more like, they never had the right to vote, and litigation has been ongoing for 8 years. It's not a sudden move just before the election, as MSM tries to tell you. You really have to look into these things to knowthat

 

[moke123]

It's not a sudden move just before the election, as MSM tries to tell you. You really have to look into these things to knowthat

you mean this?

Republicans ask Supreme Court to block 40K Arizona voters from presidential election

The RNC is asking the U.S. Supreme Court to block around 40,000 Arizona voters who did not have birth certificates when they registered to vote.

www.azfamily.com

The Arizona Secretary of State’s Office said the ruling could affect about 41,000 thousand voters, largely service members, students and Native Americans who did not have birth certificates when they registered to vote.

The RNC wants the Supreme Court to issue an emergency ruling in the case by Thursday before counties start printing ballots.

The 2022 law has never taken effect, but the RNC argues it should.

Lower courts ruled against the 2022 law, but the RNC filed an appeal this month, asking the U.S. Supreme Court to intervene.

This month isn't a sudden move before the election?

 

[Isaac]

This month isn't a sudden move before the election?

Nope. It's been ongoing litigation for 8 years.

 

[moke123]

The lawsuit concerns a 2022 law passed by the Republican-controlled legislature, but the case has its roots in 2004, when Arizona voters passed Proposition 200.

2022, 8 years.

 

[Isaac]

Yep. It's been a conflict for about 8 years, the issue is not new. This current thing is just the legal move they were due for at the time, in the process.