That's the line from the humanist and sympathetic Donald that cares about other people. And if you believe that, I have some swamp land in Florida you might want to buy. Malignant Narcissist . If you look that up there should be a picture of the Donald himself, but there is not. 60 times his law suites about election fraud have been thrown out of court. Not one succeeded. because you can't lie in court , and if you do there will be bars involved and/or law licenses revoked. There is no evidence, because none exists. It has now achieved the status of minor Urban Legend. He lost, and he can't handle it.
But as I always say, I don't vote for a person or support them politically based on how I feel about their personal human qualities quite nearly as much as I do based on what kinds of policies are they going to support.
So what have we learned since Biden took office, in what appears to be the most poignant illustration of this that I can remember in my lifetime about a president: Just because Biden, if you ran into him as a stranger in a back alley or in the laundromat, might be a nicer guy than Trump is in the same hypothetical:
Doesn't mean they're better to run our country.
Everyone can see pretty easily that generally speaking, most of Trump's policies were better for the country than most of Biden's policies (if he can be said to have "policies" other than the usual Democrat approach of
just print or tax and spend more money to give money to people complaining about x__y__ or z__"
Honestly, I almost couldn't care less at this point in our history whether our President is the type of person who is a friendly, amiable, others-focused guy or not. Yes it would be a nice bonus, but it's the last priority that can possibly be.
We just need a candidate who, as President, will push policies that make our military STRONG (not inclusive,
strong), that stop allowing countries like China and Iran to take advantage of us, that won't idolize the dream of environmental friendliness to the point where it crashes our economy, that understands Government needs to have limited function and it's OK to require personal responsibility and good choices of its citizenry, the Government's job isn't to guarantee identical outcomes (aka Equity) but rather to foster equal opportunities and acknowledge that each racial group has had cultural strengths and weaknesses that has allowed or prohibited it from achieving identical the same as the next one and Government's job is not to forcibly correct that, policies that allow states and localities to express their group conscience in areas of morality and education, policies that empower parents to be the primary decision makers over their children, policies that foster opportunities to CHOOSE to WORK rather than policies that forcibly steal money from working people and re-distribute them as benefits to cover people who have chosen to be less financially successful, and policies that aren't confused about the difference between cultural fashions versus biological realities, and policies that aren't confused about what the word "racist" and "racism" actually mean (
hint: The mere difference in outcomes between two people does not create a premise of racism, nor does simply not liking someone). A government that isn't confused about whether we normally encourage children to get vaccinated - especially using a new vaccine - against something that has about the likelihood of seriously hurting them they do of winning the lottery.
See, Trump may have been a bit of a jerk sometimes personally, but he wasn't confused about these things.
Biden and the Democrats ARE very confused.
If you want a country where people work for their own reward and then keep as much as possible of their own reward, minus extreme situations for disabled or handicapped people or those who have suffered a disaster - then
Vote Republican.
If you want a country where the determined, working % of the country gets more and more of their money forcibly taken (stolen) from them in order to soften life's blows on those who have chosen not to take advantage of the [currently 11 million open] opportunities to be successful, go ahead and vote
Democrat. Just don't call yourself a humanitarian - humanitarians don't steal from people who have made right choices. Humanitarians persuade people to voluntarily donate from their surplus to deserving causes. There is a big difference.
If you read the rest of what I said and understand that I wasn't attacking you, my comment might make more sense. Here in the US, if a person disagrees with some radical position a Democrat is proposing, it is obviously because he is a "Racist". The joke which apparently fell flat was that the Democrats loudly object to having to provide photo IDs in order to vote. They say it is "racist" at triple volume. Turning the concept around on them, we ask - "are black people too stupid to be able to get a free photo ID from the DMV?" Because, if they are not, asking for voter ID could not possibly be "racist".
