the_net_2.0
Banned
- Local time
- Today, 06:19
- Joined
- Sep 6, 2010
- Messages
- 812
hi guys,
I'm about to deploy a project to someone, but I'm afraid the strategy that I've used with my continuous forms is going to cause problems with the concurrent connection issue. They already have issues facing them due to some of the users' wireless connections, but that can't be helped at this point. The strategy that I want to use here looks good for a beginners' interface needs, but the programming might be an issue with multiple users:
What I'm really concerned about are my forms here. Attached are 4 pictures. They all are of one form, but different variations of it using the vertical scrollbar option in the continuous form. The descriptions of the images are:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1) (normal) - the way the form looks if there are less than 10 records in the bound set.
2) (less than 10) - the scroll bar option set to YES when there is less than 10 recs.
3) (more than 10) - the scroll bar option set to YES when there is more than 10 recs.
4) the form in design view.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
This form is part of a group of forms that I have called "listing forms". Each listing form has a sister form of the same name + a suffix string to indicate that it is an exact duplicate of the original listing form but with the scrollbar option set to YES. That's the only difference.
There are 2 entry/re-entry points to this form. One from the main interface and one (re-entry) from the data entry form that can be opened from the listing form. What I'm currently doing is checking the count of the bound set at both of these entry points to see if the current listing form has to be closed and it's sister form opened instead (based on the <10/>10 dataset criteria).
This whole strategy was employed because I couldn't find a solution to the scrollbar space issue that you see in the (less than 10) form. Has anyone seen this? I know there have been posts on it before, but I don't recall ever seeing a solution for this on continuous forms.
Can someone help me out here please? Either a fix to this allocated-space issue with the scrollbar, or an alternative form listing strategy. I absolutely love continuous forms because of the amount of data it can display in a single view. But my work-around solution to the scrollbar issue has me concerned about concurrent form requests. This is split to FE/BE, so the forms will be manipulated for each user individually, so there really isn't an issue if I turn record locking on.
But what about the strategy in general? It seems so heavy, I'm completely annoyed by it. Help appreciated guys! Thanks!
I'm about to deploy a project to someone, but I'm afraid the strategy that I've used with my continuous forms is going to cause problems with the concurrent connection issue. They already have issues facing them due to some of the users' wireless connections, but that can't be helped at this point. The strategy that I want to use here looks good for a beginners' interface needs, but the programming might be an issue with multiple users:
What I'm really concerned about are my forms here. Attached are 4 pictures. They all are of one form, but different variations of it using the vertical scrollbar option in the continuous form. The descriptions of the images are:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1) (normal) - the way the form looks if there are less than 10 records in the bound set.
2) (less than 10) - the scroll bar option set to YES when there is less than 10 recs.
3) (more than 10) - the scroll bar option set to YES when there is more than 10 recs.
4) the form in design view.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
This form is part of a group of forms that I have called "listing forms". Each listing form has a sister form of the same name + a suffix string to indicate that it is an exact duplicate of the original listing form but with the scrollbar option set to YES. That's the only difference.
There are 2 entry/re-entry points to this form. One from the main interface and one (re-entry) from the data entry form that can be opened from the listing form. What I'm currently doing is checking the count of the bound set at both of these entry points to see if the current listing form has to be closed and it's sister form opened instead (based on the <10/>10 dataset criteria).
This whole strategy was employed because I couldn't find a solution to the scrollbar space issue that you see in the (less than 10) form. Has anyone seen this? I know there have been posts on it before, but I don't recall ever seeing a solution for this on continuous forms.
Can someone help me out here please? Either a fix to this allocated-space issue with the scrollbar, or an alternative form listing strategy. I absolutely love continuous forms because of the amount of data it can display in a single view. But my work-around solution to the scrollbar issue has me concerned about concurrent form requests. This is split to FE/BE, so the forms will be manipulated for each user individually, so there really isn't an issue if I turn record locking on.
But what about the strategy in general? It seems so heavy, I'm completely annoyed by it. Help appreciated guys! Thanks!
Attachments
Last edited: