Glad to see progress in the fight against the New, Anti-White, Racism

[ColinEssex]

So Pat, you go along with the guidance of politicians and refer to 'white' or 'black' neighbourhoods rather than try to eliminate it into just neighbourhoods. Isnt that just fuelling racism? Nice to know where you stand.
Col

 

[AngelSpeaks]

Jussee Smolette was not attacked by Trump supporters. He even was convicted of manufacturing the attack.

 

[ColinEssex]

Your ignorance is showing as well as your downright mean spirit.

It would be nice if you can expand on that comment as I'm not sure to what you are referring. Obviously you won't, as you always avoid answering when you are asked to qualify statements.
Col

 

[The_Doc_Man]

Pat, you are letting Col goad you, and we know he likes to use such tactics to "spice things up." I am guilty of falling into this trap myself sometimes, so I can offer you this advice (based on quotes from Mark Twain):

Never argue with a fool, onlookers may not be able to tell the difference.

Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience.

Col, you know better. I did warn you once, but I make no threats this time. Just let me ask you to please dial it back in terms of your irritation level. DON'T PLAY DUMB. We all know you are smarter than as you currently portray yourself in this exchange.

So Pat, you go along with the guidance of politicians and refer to 'white' or 'black' neighbourhoods rather than try to eliminate it into just neighbourhoods. Isnt that just fuelling racism? Nice to know where you stand.

Col, that was an unkind implication. In truth, it is the politicians of the Progressive Liberal faction who are REGRESSIVE - in that they want to return to the days when people actually DEPENDED on them for sustenance (via welfare). But suddenly some of their "handouts" are falling apart and they now fear that their former constituency will recognize just how useless they are. And it doesn't matter whether Pat or I go along with the politicians. It matters how much the unthinking masses follow them and actually think about the consequences.

At the moment, I might be a bit of a cynic, but the scorecard reads: Unthinking masses follow divisive politicians = entirely too many; unthinking masses think about the consequences of following divisive politicians = virtually zero.

 

[ColinEssex]

By mean spirit, I mean that you always assume the worst possible interpretation of anything someone says. And you are just plain ignorant of what America is actually all about. You believe the worst things you hear from the talking heads of the left who are actively trying to start a race war, and never question it. If America is such a racist, hateful country, why do MILLIONS of people sneak in every year ILLEGALLY to escape the places they came from? If Americans hate black people so much, why do ANY black people want to emigrate? Are all immigrants, legal and otherwise, just plain stupid? Why don't they sneak into other countries? Or are you just so ignorant you are willing to believe we are all racist? We can probably count on one hand the combined number of illegal immigrants that sneak into Nigeria and Cuba and China and Russia every year. But America is "racist"???? Look inside your self sometime. There is no cure for stupid but ignorance is a choice.

If someone writes something that can be interpreted several ways, then they need to re-read their text to ensure it states what they actually mean.

I won't call you ignorant as its rude and incorrect. But, if (for example) you were to have no idea of British, or French or German politics, that would be normal as you are American. We, as foreigners mostly have no idea of American politics. That is normal - not as you call me ignorant. The only two american politicians we know are Joe Biden- who is senile and falls over alot, who also has authorised the sending of cluster bombs to murder hundreds of innocent people (banned in 120 countries) and of course Donald Trump- who is orange and an idiot, a liar and cheat.
I have no idea in American politics what or who is left/right/centre/up or down or whatever you call it. Its perfectly normal for Americans to know, but not us foreigners and to call us ignorant is frankly rudeness.

Immigration- yesterday, we had 700 illegal immigrants cross the English Channel to come to the UK. They also migrate to France, Spain, Germany, Italy etc. (Those are European countries). We have exactly the same problem with Immigration as you.they come to you, us or wherever for the hope of a better life than their war torn countries.
America racist? yes of course, but not all. We don't have white or black neighbourhoods, just neighbourhoods and usually it doesn't matter what colour people are. Yes, of course we have racism, but not to the pro rata extent in the USA.
It maybe you Pat are black or a red Indian or Chinese I have no idea, does it matter? No of course not.

So in essence, if you chastise someone for not understanding American politics or lifestyle, don't you think that is a blinkered view?
I suppose you'll dislike this post and get Doc to warn me for something or ban me. But remember, I don't call other members ignorant or stupid, I try to be polite, even if it's proved some here lie about things.
Col

 

[The_Doc_Man]

I have no idea in American politics what or who is left/right/centre/up or down or whatever you call it.

Actually, I'll answer that for you with an easy way to remember. We have two major political parties and a few very minor political parties. The easy way to remember them is that both Left and Liberal start with an "L" - and the party of the Conservatives is the Republicans, which is to the Right, and both Republican and Right start with an "R."

I understand that you have other parties that are at least similar (though not identical). In the past, your politics divided things up more than we do. (And in fact, we SHOULD try to force the two major parties to sub-divide - but they aren't allowing that right now.) For you, there was a Liberal group and there still is a Conservative group, and I believe you have a Labour group that now takes the place of the Liberal group as the opposition to the Conservatives.

If you like to think about right-wing groups being more rigid and authoritarian, and left-wing groups being looser and more liberal, then again you have "L" for "loose" and "R" for "rigid."

In the extremes along these lines, we get no further help from the alphabet because the extremists of the right wing are fascists and dictators, and the extremists on the left wing are socialists or communists. The current USA leadership is trying to push the country towards socialism. The "opposition" part is not allowing that push to succeed.

 

[ColinEssex]

So what about the 'D' for Democrats? Or is 'D' the 'L' under another name?

Anyway, we all know it's the turn of the 'R' at the next Presidential election so that means 4 or 5 years of orange. I can't see the people voting in an old bloke who sleeps alot, they'd rather have a liar and cheat as president.
Col

 

[Cotswold]

Here in England we progressed well last week.
A theatre announced non-caucasian audiences only and a school announced non-caucasian classes.

Apparently if you're not caucasian it's Ok to do this

 

[ebs17]

The current USA leadership is trying to push the country towards socialism.

Are you about to nationalize large companies and make them public property?
The rule of money is replaced by the dictatorship of the proletariat?

 

[The_Doc_Man]

So what about the 'D' for Democrats? Or is 'D' the 'L' under another name?

Anyway, we all know it's the turn of the 'R' at the next Presidential election so that means 4 or 5 years of orange. I can't see the people voting in an old bloke who sleeps alot, they'd rather have a liar and cheat as president.
Col

Affirmative to the "D" vs. "L" question... a liberal under any other name still gives away money.

Don't know if "the Donald" will get back in, but there IS that old saying about "the devil you know vs. the devil you don't." This might yet turn into another Trump vs. Biden election, and we know both of those old devils. But this is also a case where a potential competitor for Trump is DeSantis, who is perhaps equally extreme and who makes me very nervous. I see him as extremely anti-gay, and I have already made it clear in other posts that I have gay friends and family members.

 

[Isaac]

I agree, they have a right to poverty. And, where do suggest they go to get off the Res, given the state of poverty they are in.

It depends, but out of the 25+ times I've moved in my life, 90% of them were when I was young and had absolutely no money except for minimum wage jobs. I assume many of them are the same. It takes the will to make the change. I went wherever was more affordable, and followed my need to work.

 

[ebs17]

the Democrats are more like Facists

I would caution against using terms too lightly. Fascism as the ruling system is known in Europe and South America.
There is a huge difference between being bitten by a mosquito and being kicked by an elephant.

 

[ebs17]

Fascism is dictatorship. You will be picked up quickly to clarify a factual situation. No one knows if you can come back.
Talk carefully about things you can't begin to grasp.

 

[ColinEssex]

Normal people assume the more positive interpretation but hateful people assume the worst interpretation and you take it to the extreme. Doc, is right. There is no talking with you. So, I'm signing off now.

Gosh, you really are so narrow minded. I suggest the opticians to check for tunnel vision. Or maybe its hormonal, that would seem logical.
Col

 

[ColinEssex]

So, I'm signing off now.

Looking at the post timings, your 'signing off' lasted less than a minute. Actually, just that comment demonstrates brilliantly what I said about not posting clearly. That one comment can be interpreted in three different ways.
Quiz - try to spot all three.
Col