hi Jz, I was trying to figure out how to make foreign keys, but I wasn't able to. So, if I make them into multiple tables, will there still be parent tables that effect child tables? So, if I select something like Kung Fu, then my Substyles narrow down to Shaolin, Wing Chun, Choy Fat, Hung Ga, etc. without choices from other parent styles, such as Okinawa, Shotokan, Goju-Ryu, etc. - all being Karate styles. Orgin refers to the Martial Art style, Kung Fu is of course from China, Origin 2 can be more specific, such as a particular province, city, or region of China.
Logically, I would want to be able to browse my database multiple ways, such as by parent Martial Art style, or by Origin, and of course by alphabetical names of instructors - as when I want to call someone and need to look up their information.
I imagine that browsing by their price rate would not be as difficult either? For instance, a quarry form where I am able to select that I want to search for a LOCAL - TaeKwonDo Instructor - with HOURLY RATES between $20 and $40.
Like any Access process, I believe I design the tables first, the relationships second, a form to input the information (in the easiest format), and then a quarry form for retrieving the information. I think you are right that I probably have step wrong and therefore cannot accomplish step 2 correctly.
Does any of the information I added on this reply post change the table format that you propose?
Thank you kindly.
Logically, I would want to be able to browse my database multiple ways, such as by parent Martial Art style, or by Origin, and of course by alphabetical names of instructors - as when I want to call someone and need to look up their information.
I imagine that browsing by their price rate would not be as difficult either? For instance, a quarry form where I am able to select that I want to search for a LOCAL - TaeKwonDo Instructor - with HOURLY RATES between $20 and $40.
Like any Access process, I believe I design the tables first, the relationships second, a form to input the information (in the easiest format), and then a quarry form for retrieving the information. I think you are right that I probably have step wrong and therefore cannot accomplish step 2 correctly.
Does any of the information I added on this reply post change the table format that you propose?
Thank you kindly.