Obama Being Arrested - what would you think of that? (3 Viewers)

Isaac

Lifelong Learner
Local time
Today, 15:11
Joined
Mar 14, 2017
Messages
11,431
Let's say the DOJ decides Obama lied or conspired in some criminal capacity and actually arrests him tomorrow.

What would you think of that, and why? What do you think the fallout would be from that, and do you think your choice about him being arrested takes that into account - if so, why?
 
If he broke the law, it is what it is.

The only problem I see is what the DOJ has become under trump.

I read today that out of 38 cases brought before grand juries in L.A. due to the immigration raids, they were only able to indict 7. That's so out of character for the Feds.
 
I read today that out of 38 cases brought before grand juries in L.A. due to the immigration raids, they were only able to indict 7. That's so out of character for the Feds
Is that criminal cases , not immigration stuff?
 
I should clarify - let's say they arrest Obama based on what is now known.
 
Like whatever docs and various people's interpretations of them , all the reports and investigations going all directions - all the stuff that's already 'out there', in other words I'm not talking about if we find out tomorrow he murdered someone, just what is already in existence
 
My concern over what Obama is purported to have done is whether (a) it was done in line with a direct or tangential presidential duty (in which case SCOTUS would say the President has qualified immunity) or (b) there isn't enough evidence.
 
If you noticed what Tulsi said, she wants journalists to do their jobs. That's a request not evidence. Republicans would need super solid evidence to take down the head of the deepstate. I mean let's get real.
 
If he committed a crime, he should face the consequences.
In the abstract I agree completely with that.
Kind of worry about how everything would actually play out though then and in the future
 
Obama was/is the Manchurian Candidate. The enemy within.
The irony is that in the Democrats in their attempts to get Trump, have inadvertently protected Obama, as President, from the consequences of his illegitimate actions of using the power-of-the state to get Trump.

Trump v. United States (2024)

The fundamental tragedy is that the Democrats were "first" to explicitly implement the repugnant third world strategy of arresting political opponents. Now that Obama's (Democratic party) scam has been exposed, Republicans will be susceptible to being accused of playing third world (arrest) politics even-though it was the Democrats who started it. Democrats are the ultimate masters of language manipulation and propaganda. The public unfortunately is gullible.

Since this topic came-up, the issue goes beyond Trump. We have: General Flynn, Roger Stone, Steve Bannon, and Peter Navarro; besides others. These were all political hit jobs by the Democrats. Don't forget the inappropriate Trump impeachments, the Russia Hoax, the 14th Amendment, and Bragg's ridiculous charge of falsifying business records. There is history in the Democrats abhorrent actions.

Fortunately for Obama and the Democrats, Republicans don't have courage to go for the jugular. So Obama will get to skate by.
 
Last edited:
Obama’s dirty fingerprints were all over the cooked-up intelligence claiming that Moscow helped Trump in some grand collusion conspiracy.
Gilbertson said that “the establishment media, I got the sense yesterday, they’re going to fight tooth and nail to just make this go away. There were murmurings in the briefing room as Gabbard was laying some of this out. I heard somebody murmur liar in the back of the room, there was some grandstanding from some veteran establishment journalists that were in the back of the room, too.”
 
Let's say the DOJ decides Obama lied or conspired in some criminal capacity and actually arrests him tomorrow.
I have no problem with Obama being arrested if he committed a crime. Did you have a problem with Trump being arrested when he was charged with made up crimes?

Obama, Clinton, and Biden would never do time. Trump would pardon them all if it came to that. Although treason does come with the death penalty. I don't think the DOJ would push treason though because of the penalty. I'm not even sure that a coup qualifies as treason. But proving that the three of them conspired to overthrow the presidency would be good enough. Looks like Gabbard has the goods. They were in it up to their armpits.
 
Note the the Flynn and Trump setups. This is anecdotal evidence that the Democrats were out to undermine the Trump administration.
Now this travesty if being exposed.
Video clip where Representative Jim Jordan (R‑OH) asserts that the Trump-Russia intelligence briefing was a set up
 
The deep state protecting their interests.


From: The House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. Washington, D.C., June 25, 2024

"some of the statement’s signatories were on active contract with the CIA at the time they issued the statement to discredit damaging allegations about Biden family influence peddling".


In October 2020, a group of 51 former senior intelligence officials, released an open letter stating that the Hunter Biden laptop "has all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation".

James Clapper, Michael Hayden, Leon Panetta, John Brennan, Thomas Fingar, Rick Ledgett, John McLaughlin, Michael Morell, James Bruce, David Cariens, Janice Cariens, Paul Kolbe, Peter Corsell, Brett Davis, Roger Zane George, Steven Hall, Kent Harrington, Don Hepburn, Timothy Kilbourn, Ron Marks, Jonna Mendez, Emile Nakhleh, Gerald O’Shea, David Priess, Pam Purcilly, Marc Polymeropoulos, Chris Savos, Nick Shapiro, John Sipher, Stephen Slick, Cynthia Strand, Greg Tarbell, David Terry, Greg Treverton, John Tullius, David Vanell, Winston Wiley, Kristin Wood, Andrew Liepman, Nada Bakos, Patty Brandmaier.
 
As an add-on that I previously overlooked (thanks to @AccessBlaster). Hunter Biden's Laptop from hell. The media, such as AP News, attempted to suppress. The question of whether Obama should be arrested has now gone from speculative fringe theory to a documented criminal conspiracy.

Ironically, Democrats attempted to assert that Presidents are not immune from criminal conduct in an attempt to get Trump. Democrats should be profusely thanking the US Supreme Court for giving them that relief opportunity. Obama may escape justice (arrest) due to that limited immunity.
 
There are forces at play that are beyond even the presidency if the United States. They have to go along to get along, that much I am convinced.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom