B burrina Registered User. Local time Today, 12:12 Joined May 10, 2014 Messages 972 Mar 12, 2015 #1 ="Record" & Count([EmployeeID]) & " of" & Count([EmployeeID]) & "Records" Click to expand... As an Example is not a Good Solution since records can be deleted,etc... What would be a better alternative to show what record you are on of how many records?
="Record" & Count([EmployeeID]) & " of" & Count([EmployeeID]) & "Records" Click to expand... As an Example is not a Good Solution since records can be deleted,etc... What would be a better alternative to show what record you are on of how many records?
Frothingslosh Premier Pale Stale Ale Local time Today, 13:12 Joined Oct 17, 2012 Messages 3,276 Mar 12, 2015 #2 The best solution would probably be the navigation buttons that forms have by default. I assume that's not really what you're looking for?
The best solution would probably be the navigation buttons that forms have by default. I assume that's not really what you're looking for?
B burrina Registered User. Local time Today, 12:12 Joined May 10, 2014 Messages 972 Mar 12, 2015 #3 No, not really. They use up too much valuable Real Estate. Thanks,
Frothingslosh Premier Pale Stale Ale Local time Today, 13:12 Joined Oct 17, 2012 Messages 3,276 Mar 12, 2015 #4 burrina said: No, not really. They use up too much valuable Real Estate. Thanks, Click to expand... Wow, considering how small they are, that's kind of scary. Okay, you can make a text box in the Detail section and use this as the control source: Code: =[CurrentRecord] & " of " & Count(*)
burrina said: No, not really. They use up too much valuable Real Estate. Thanks, Click to expand... Wow, considering how small they are, that's kind of scary. Okay, you can make a text box in the Detail section and use this as the control source: Code: =[CurrentRecord] & " of " & Count(*)
B burrina Registered User. Local time Today, 12:12 Joined May 10, 2014 Messages 972 Mar 13, 2015 #5 Guess it depends on your needs and design constraints. Anyway, that was what I was after, Thanks,