Shocking news about UtterAccess owner (2 Viewers)

Isaac said:
I've sometimes wondered about that when I hear people being charged with something that's 100% digital evidence, it's concerning.
People are innocent until proven guilty. And unfortunately, I'm sure there is that 1% who are still innocent even after being convicted..

I also note that the term 'child' means vastly different things in different contexts and to different people.
Theoretically it would be possible to have the intention of downloading/watching pure porn, and not realize that underage's had gotten caught up in the mix of it. Thus the evidence would be very solid, except that little piece of evidence missing that you knew they were underage....
Especially relevant if/when the context is, i.e.,. 17 yr olds. I.E. some people call Epstein's saga a matter of "child porn", and still others call him (incorrectly) a pedophile, when that's not really what the word means. Personally I'd prefer the terms not be so malleable, because if someone really is into 5 year olds that's something I'd put in a whole different category than 16-17 yr olds, it's just an entirely different thing. They both may be wrong (the latter only in the last 1% of human history), but they are entirely different.
But I digress..
Click to expand...
US DOJ doesn't indict people unless they have compelling evidence to win convictions.
 
BlueSpruce said:
US DOJ doesn't indict people unless they have compelling evidence to win convictions.
Click to expand...

Oh, if only that were true. However, there is some suspicion - held by both sides of the aisle - that politics can blur the optics.
 
The_Doc_Man said:
Oh, if only that were true. However, there is some suspicion - held by both sides of the aisle - that politics can blur the optics.
Click to expand...
Yes, DOJ is more politicized, but overall they apply more neutrality with lower profile people.
 
BlueSpruce said:
US DOJ doesn't indict people unless they have compelling evidence to win convictions.
Click to expand...
Another way to say that is, people are scared and 95% of them plead out. Meaning nothing as to their culpability
 
Isaac said:
in the 2 or 3 % that don't plea bargain, yes
Click to expand...
Some prosecutors don't offer plea deals. For those that do, if defendants choose to fight charges, "we the people" will throw the book at them and sentence to many years. Like I said, government doesn't prosecute unless they're confident they can win the case.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 3 (members: 1, guests: 2)
Back
Top Bottom