MajP
You've got your good things, and you've got mine.
- Local time
- Today, 18:36
- Joined
- May 21, 2018
- Messages
- 9,787
I am with Pat, this is such an overly engineered approach to do a trivial task in Access. If you did it using Access and not working around it.
If you want to go this route and you are experienced in .net then you are much better off building it in .net as the front end and using either your access db as the back end or migrating to sql server. You have more direct control if you go with a .net FE.
Since it runs on access it will run on a free version of SQL. Either go that route or stop what you are doing and do it like everyone else would do in Access. But this whole moving to a dictionary is silly, IMO.
If you want to go this route and you are experienced in .net then you are much better off building it in .net as the front end and using either your access db as the back end or migrating to sql server. You have more direct control if you go with a .net FE.
Since it runs on access it will run on a free version of SQL. Either go that route or stop what you are doing and do it like everyone else would do in Access. But this whole moving to a dictionary is silly, IMO.