Trump Administration Predictions (1 Viewer)

[Pat Hartman]

Didn't Trump cave and sign a big spending bill 2 months ago?

Yes he did. Should he have shut down the government? Probably not. I don't think this was the hill he wanted to die on. To me, it is the POS REPUBLICANS who are working against the Trump agenda and that is why they did so poorly in the special elections. No Republican that I have ever voted for in decades except for Trump has actually done what he promised on the campaign trail. Sadly, the Dems do frequently produce (although never for inner city blacks, there is too much graft available). It is just that I don't want the social "justice" programs and "climate change" programs, etc. They are all just boondoggles that allow people to virtue signal but in reality solve no problem or in the case of social "justice" programs institute a new form of discrimination. I think the dumb kids who voted for this in the past started getting the message. If you are white, and especially male, YOU will be discriminated against in the workplace due to DEI. YOU will be denied scholarships and other free stuff in favor of those who check some boxes.

 

[The_Doc_Man]

I know, having someone challenge your deeply held beliefs can be uncomfortable.

Yes. We can easily see how uncomfortable you are.

 

[AngelSpeaks]

I remember. The Japanese companies did even better after they started building in the US (as did the American consumers).

The advantage was that the Japanese companies (especially Toyota) had better cars for less money. Critical parts of Japanese-American cars are still made in Japan. The Japanese cars were better because the US had abolished Japan's aviation industry during the occupation, so the best engineers in Japan went into the auto industry while the best engineers in the US went into aerospace.

Which forces the US manufacturers to build bettter.

 

[Thales750]

A took a while for the Japanese to catch up in quality. By the 1980's, they were generally better which was when I started driving them.

Yup, they were generally more reliable, and got better fuel economy. The improvements in design, safety, luxury, and performance came from reverse engineering European cars.

 

[Thales750]

Yes. We can easily see how uncomfortable you are.

My discomfort comes from being able to see what is being visited upon us.

 

[Thales750]

YOU will be discriminated against in the workplace due to DEI. YOU will be denied scholarships and other free stuff in favor of those who check some boxes.

Hilary feminist and restitution supporters are why we have MAGA

 

[Thales750]

Predictions: the MAGA brainwashing committee is going to spin all these new US chip manufacturering facilities as a Trump tariff success.

 

[Thales750]

Texas Senate passes anti-solar, wind bill

The bill exclusively places permit restrictions, fees and new regulatory requirements for solar and wind projects.

pv-magazine-usa.com

I guess ending excessive regulations halts at ideological lines in the sand.

 

[RogerCooper]

Yes he did. Should he have shut down the government? Probably not. I don't think this was the hill he wanted to die on. To me, it is the POS REPUBLICANS who are working against the Trump agenda and that is why they did so poorly in the special elections. No Republican that I have ever voted for in decades except for Trump has actually done what he promised on the campaign trail. Sadly, the Dems do frequently produce (although never for inner city blacks, there is too much graft available). It is just that I don't want the social "justice" programs and "climate change" programs, etc. They are all just boondoggles that allow people to virtue signal but in reality solve no problem or in the case of social "justice" programs institute a new form of discrimination. I think the dumb kids who voted for this in the past started getting the message. If you are white, and especially male, YOU will be discriminated against in the workplace due to DEI. YOU will be denied scholarships and other free stuff in favor of those who check some boxes.

I remember Trump campaigning on lower prices, not higher prices. Trump made many contradictory campaign promises, so by fulfilling some, he violated others. Shutting down government DEI is a good idea, but the harm of DEI is small compared to the harm of his trade war on America.

As to the idea that the Republicans are losing elections because they are insufficiently pro-Trump, the polls say otherwise. But I am glad that you are not going to be blaming the upcoming losses in the 2026 elections on illegal aliens voting.

 

[RogerCooper]

I remember Trump campaigning on lower prices, not higher prices. Trump made many contradictory campaign promises, so by fulfilling some, he violated others. Shutting down government DEI is a good idea, but the harm of DEI is small compared to the harm of his trade war on America.

As to the idea that the Republicans are losing elections because they are insufficiently pro-Trump, the polls say otherwise. But I am glad that you are not going to be blaming the upcoming losses in the 2026 elections on illegal aliens voting.

Trump just threatened for Fed Chairman Powell unless he cuts interest rates (which would increase prices).

 

[NauticalGent]

In all the posts on this thread, I am surprised that no one has mentioned the firings that have firings that have occurred (some high ranking women), the disbanding of EO and the assault on DEI policies and the cutting of federal funding to schools that allow mixed-gender sports.

I thought for sure there would be some wailing and gnashing of teeth, but I see little to no "churn" on these subjects. It could be that they have escaped my notice, but I tend to see these...

Trump just threatened for Fed Chairman Powell unless he cuts interest rates (which would increase prices).

I'm not saying you're wrong, but I am curious how they are related...?

 

[RogerCooper]

In all the posts on this thread, I am surprised that no one has mentioned the firings that have firings that have occurred (some high ranking women), the disbanding of EO and the assault on DEI policies and the cutting of federal funding to schools that allow mixed-gender sports.

I thought for sure there would be some wailing and gnashing of teeth, but I see little to no "churn" on these subjects. It could be that they have escaped my notice, but I tend to see these...


I'm not saying you're wrong, but I am curious how they are related...?

It is easier to talk about Trump's economic policies where the effects are objectively measurable and he has delivered the reverse of his promises, high prices instead of low prices, higher government spending rather than lower and stock market crash rather than a boom.

On DEI he has sort of delivered on some of his promises. My libertarian answer is that government should not practice DEI, but it has no business forcing pro or anti DEI policies on private entities.

Similarly on the question of trans-gender athletes I don't see that the government has any business in this. How to handle transsexual and intersexual athletes is a difficult question, but it is question to be answered by sports associations and the like, not the government.

From my point of view, there is little difference between MAGA and woke. They both seek to force people to live by their dictates rather than allowing them to make their own choices.

 

[NauticalGent]

On DEI he has sort of delivered on some of his promises. My libertarian answer is that government should not practice DEI, but it has no business forcing pro or anti DEI policies on private entities.

Similarly on the question of trans-gender athletes I don't see that the government has any business in this. How to handle transsexual and intersexual athletes is a difficult question, but it is question to be answered by sports associations and the like, not the government.

From my point of view, there is little difference between MAGA and woke. They both seek to force people to live by their dictates rather than allowing them to make their own choices.

You and I are in complete agreement on this. I'm just surprised there hasn't been any mention of it here.

I have read (Ron Paul) about the adverse effects of tariffs - they are by nature, not good for the consumer. The current admin's defense on them is to coerce other countries into lowering theirs. I have no idea if this is effective in the long run - one thing is for sure, it is going to be painful at first.

 

[RogerCooper]

You and I are in complete agreement on this. I'm just surprised there hasn't been any mention of it here.

I have read (Ron Paul) about the adverse effects of tariffs - they are by nature, not good for the consumer. The current admin's defense on them is to coerce other countries into lowering theirs. I have no idea if this is effective in the long run - one thing is for sure, it is going to be painful at first.

Most developed countries don't charge high tariffs so we can't coerce them into lowering them.

 

[The_Doc_Man]

On DEI he has sort of delivered on some of his promises. My libertarian answer is that government should not practice DEI, but it has no business forcing pro or anti DEI policies on private entities.

I agree with that, but would like to supplement your comment. Successful DEI policies by private entities will depend on their ability to find people qualified to do the job asked of them. A non-profit company will care about DEI issues somewhat less than a for-profit company, but when you have a bunch of dead-head employees (in this case, employees in name but who don't do anything useful), it will not be long before budgetary forces limit your ability to keep said employees on-board.

I had a cousin - now long-dead - who was a union worker for the Pullman Corporation - maker of railroad cars. He was a quality-control inspector. Once about every hour, a new rail car would come down the tracks. He would inspect the joints, welds, and seams on the outside and would also examine the inside for hazardous spots. He admitted to me that the cars were coming out with very few flaws, and that he would have to shunt a "bad car" aside maybe every two or three days. Most of the time, he would have half-hour cat-naps between inspections. I loved my cousin for his loving and friendly ways, but his job was NOT highly efficient in terms of using his time. Oh,... he would not have qualified for DEI factors.

 

[Pat Hartman]

but the harm of DEI is small compared to the harm of his trade war on America.

It is people like you who are causing the trade war. YOU are giving the Chinese the hope that Trump will cave. Without all the lies in the press, other countries would have come to the table and negotiated fair treaties. You give them hope that Trump will waffle and so they can continue their unequal tariffs with impunity.

It is easier to talk about Trump's economic policies where the effects are objectively measurable and he has delivered the reverse of his promises, high prices instead of low prices, higher government spending rather than lower and stock market crash rather than a boom.

How can you possibly judge a policy that has been in place for a whopping 5 minutes?

have read (Ron Paul) about the adverse effects of tariffs - they are by nature, not good for the consumer.

Then why do you object to Trump's attempt to get rid of them? I know you don't listen to what Trump says. You rely totally on the left's interpretation of what Trump "meant" by what he said. Trump wants "fair" trade so that would preferably be no tariffs or other barriers including currency manipulation and IP theft and this has been his opinion for 40+ years. He hasn't vacillated and he isn't vacillating now. The interim solution is reciprocal tariffs. He needs something that will bring other countries to the table to negotiate. Trump is gloating about how much money the interim tariffs are generating to convince the other countries that he is perfectly happy with the status quo to encourage them to step up and negotiate. And you believe the ruse.

 

[Thales750]

In all the posts on this thread, I am surprised that no one has mentioned the firings that have firings that have occurred (some high ranking women), the disbanding of EO and the assault on DEI policies and the cutting of federal funding to schools that allow mixed-gender sports.

I thought for sure there would be some wailing and gnashing of teeth, but I see little to no "churn" on these subjects. It could be that they have escaped my notice, but I tend to see these...


I'm not saying you're wrong, but I am curious how they are related...?

Maybe because we are not a bunch of ignorent Liberals, like your accusations typically indicate. Maybe we are informered, articulate, concerned citizens, with an understanding of what is important.

You know, like the Madman at 1600 Pensilvania with his finger on the global eceonomy destrustion button.

 

[NauticalGent]

bunch of ignorent Liberals, like your accusations typically indicate.

I don't think I have ever made that accusation

You know, like the Madman at 1600 Pensilvania with his finger on the global eceonomy destrustion button

But then again...

 

[AccessBlaster]

Honestly, I think the liberals are being rocked on their heels. It's impossible for them to react to anything, so they are focused on tariffs and Kilmar Abrego-Garcia

 

[NauticalGent]

Who is Abrego-Garcia?