Access Essentials sticky thread recommendations

[Uncle Gizmo]

Ah, I see.... What you're thinking is have a minimum number of stickies, and one of them a nicely formatted web page like your example with subsections linking to the different elements of Microsoft Access.

 

[Uncle Gizmo]

The problem is getting people involved. There's no way one person is going to be able to do this, well, not in any reasonable length of time anyway. The first problem is Gathering suitable threads, and even that's not happening. All people have to do is post a link to a thread that is suitable, but people are not yet in the Habit of bringing them to attention.

 

[Jon]

Indeed. My response was only directed towards the question of one sticky leading to other sub threads, verses keeping it all in one thread.

 

[Shimon]

Hi,
Thanks for all your effort in making this forum such a great place for info and help.
This subject is super important IMHO

bad-data-is-bad-for-business-1-and-2.324342


Sincerely,
Shimon

 

[The_Doc_Man]

speaking of engineers, Jon, I would be you a million bucks that I could take the following terms and convert them to common sense terms:

=>polymorphism
=>abstraction
=>encapsulation
=>object orientation

Just looked this over and realized I missed it. You can make new definitions as explanations, but if you fail to use the correct terms at all and only render these terms using your "common sense" terms, you hamper the newbies from knowing the correct words as used in the computer industry and thus hamper their web searches because they still don't know the right words to use in the questions they ask. Many times we get newbies here who claim that their search was useless because they didn't know what a particular feature/ability was called.

Of course, vba_php (Adam) has returned as @conception_native_0123 since he had a tendency to get himself banned in his earlier years on the forum.