$83.3 Million Ouch!

[Isaac]

Here is another example of the unfair justice system when it comes to allegations of sexual misconduct. Christian Horner has his name plastered over the front pages of a newspaper, whlie the accuser remains anonymous. Is this really the way to go about things?

The reputational damage from these things rarely goes away, even for the innocent.

Christian Horner is under investigation at Red Bull

MailOnline understands the accusations surrounding Christian Horner, the husband of Spice Girls singer Geri Halliwell, relate to claims of wrongdoing made by a team employee.

www.dailymail.co.uk

I agree, it's very unfair to allow an accused's life to be ruined in multiple ways at the same time the accuser can remain anonymous
I would be ok with that combination of things but only AFTER conviction

 

[Mike Krailo]

It's almost like baring false witness by advertising the accusers info in that way. Red Bull has wings.

 

[moke123]

Looks like Trump lost yet another legal issue. Unanimous decision of appellate court - No Immunity.

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cadc.40415/gov.uscourts.cadc.40415.1208593677.0.pdf

 

[Isaac]

This may sound unkind, as if I have no sympathy for another man's bank account.

Nonetheless I'm going to say it: You do realize the only issue that matters is the 2024 election right?
That's surely the only thing I care if he wins or loses.

Frankly, I expect him to lose the vast majority of any and all legal cases that come against him (esp. in places like NYC and DC), for obvious reasons.
No surprise to anyone I don't think.

 

[Pat Hartman]

Looks like Trump lost yet another legal issue. Unanimous decision of appellate court - No Immunity.

And you are happy about this why? You do realize that Presidential immunity is lost for ALL presidents, not just the one that is alive and well and living rent free in your head, right?

 

[moke123]

You do realize that Presidential immunity is lost for ALL presidents

Do you realize they never had it to begin with? Read the decision. You might learn something.

 

[Pat Hartman]

Do you realize they never had it to begin with?

They cannot be prosecuted for actions they take regarding their Presidential duties. If they could, every single President would be swamped with lawsuits the moment they left office. The immunity doesn't extend to murdering someone like the judges used as their "standard". It is the Duty of the President to ensure that elections are honest. He had reason to believe there was cheating in the 2020 election. Whether he could "prove" it or not is moot. The point is he was trying to investigate the issues. That is what we do when there is something questionable. WE INVESTIGATE.

 

[moke123]

Read the decision pat. Don't take tuckers word for it.

The President, of course, also has a duty under the Take Care Clause to faithfully enforce the laws. This duty encompasses following the legal procedures for determining election results and ensuring that executive power vests in the new President at the constitutionally appointed time. To the extent former President Trump maintains that the post-2020 election litigation that his campaign and supporters unsuccessfully pursued implemented his Take Care duty, he is in error. See infra n.14. Former President Trump’s alleged conduct conflicts with his constitutional mandate to enforce the laws governing the process of electing the new President.

 

[Pat Hartman]

And he was trying to get Georgia to investigate.

 

[Steve R.]

Read the decision pat. Don't take tuckers word for it.

And he was trying to get Georgia to investigate.

Dershowitz slams GA indictment, says Trump used same tactics as Al Gore in 2000: not a ‘crime'

Harvard professor Alan Dershowitz, speaking to Fox News Digital, criticized the pending indictment, calling Trump’s actions "very similar" to that of Al Gore’s legal strategy in the Bush v. Gore case that decided the 2000 presidential election.

www.foxnews.com

 

[Pat Hartman]

I give up Steve. When you have TDS, it warps your ability to think rationally. You get so excited when something "bad" happens to Trump that you can't even see the hyprocasy of it. All I can say is that it is very good for the Dems that Trump won't try to punish them once he wins in 2024. Worst case is that he will prosecute actual crimes assuming he ever gets control of the DOJ.

 

[Isaac]

Poor Biden by the time the election comes along and giving his dementia and constant confusion, he will probably be down by 30 points in the polls