Yes, superconductor sensors multiply the sensitivity available vs. more conventional sensors. I had to do a "fake" research paper during my grad student days to discuss available topics. Had to prove that I was keeping up with the literature. It happened that the seminal work on superconductivity (by Bardeen, Cooper, and Schriefer) had just been awarded the Nobel Prize for physics. So, being opportunistic and wanting to show that I was keeping up with current events, I found a couple of papers that discussed the increased sensitivity of superconducting infrared bolometers and magnetometers. That was early 1970s. So far as I recall, the purpose of the "fake research paper" exercise was to prove that I was able to (a) follow complex research threads across multiple journals and (b) make a coherent presentation of my findings.