Are you an atheist? (1 Viewer)

[Rabbie]

Love makes good people do bad things. Shall we prohibit that too?

Lets keep calm guys. All I ask for is the freedom not to believe in what I consider to be a fairy story - Father Christmas seems a better bet if I have to believe in something. However I feel the same freedom should be extended to everyone to believe what they feel is true but they should not be allowed to force their views on other people. Organised religions(or Love) should not be banned but they should not be allowed to preach hatred and encourage people to be violent to other people.

I suspect that the problem with organised religions is that they are primarily human organisations and have all the faults of human organisations.

 

[Pauldohert]

I have seen God!

 

[Rabbie]

I have seen God!

Looks like you have managed to close this thread quite effectively

 

[ColinEssex]

I have seen God!

I found Jesus - he was hiding behind our sofa all the time. Soon sent him packing.

Col

 

[Rabbie]

I found Jesus - he was hiding behind our sofa all the time. Soon sent him packing.

Col

I didn't know he was missing!

 

[dan-cat]

Science can only describe/explain phenomena that exist within the limitations of space and time. Beyond those limits, science cannot go except in speculation. That's reality, as I see it. If you disagree then fine. Show me where I'm wrong. My rationale: God, if he exists, created space and time. He isn't limited by them. Science can NEVER get a handle on God. He's beyond the scope of our very existence. He's not some clever fellow playing harps on a cloud who we can send a plane up to photograph; he's not some cowardly alien 'hiding' behind Alpha Centauri; he's GOD.

Yes. It is the hubrisp) of the human mind to think that this concept can be totally hammered into our frame of perception.

The requested evidence can only be perceived if you enter the mind of God. We are far below the required standard but hold delusions of grandeur because of our ability to be aware of ourselves and thus question our own held place in space and time.

This ability to question is no evidence that we hold the capacity to know all.

 

[Rabbie]

Yes. It is the hubrisp) of the human mind to think that this concept can be totally hammered into our frame of perception.

The requested evidence can only be perceived if you enter the mind of God. We are far below the required standard but hold delusions of grandeur because of our ability to be aware of ourselves and thus question our own held place in space and time.

This ability to question is no evidence that we hold the capacity to know all.

Evidence for what If it is evidence for the existence of God then surely you are begging the question if you have to enter his mind to see the evidence.

This thread has been interesting but inconclusive. I doubt if anyone has changed their position as a result of it. Posts like 253 from Pauldohert are impossible to refute without being disrespectful of him and so do little to advance the debate.

 

[Pauldohert]

I have seen God!

 

[Rabbie]

I have seen God!

Paul as a concerned friend I would advise you to speak to your priest (you did say you were a catholic)

 

[dan-cat]

Evidence for what If it is evidence for the existence of God then surely you are begging the question if you have to enter his mind to see the evidence.

It is not my position to require evidence of God to justify the possibility of it. That is the thread starters. My position is, is that it is incorrect to deny the possibility of a thing that by definition is beyond your scope of comprehension.

This thread has been interesting but inconclusive.

I would like to think that Dawkins suggested correlation between spirituality and lack of intelligence can now be taken with a pinch of salt.

 

[Pauldohert]

As a complete aside - at my local church, there was a monk/priest - I can't remember which, who fell in the garden of the monastery(old priest/monk home) and died, this was announced at mass.

What they didn't tell us was, that he thought he was Jesus and could fly, he fell in the garden from the 3 floor.

True

 

[Brianwarnock]

This thread has been interesting but inconclusive. I doubt if anyone has changed their position as a result of it. Posts like 253 from Pauldohert are impossible to refute without being disrespectful of him and so do little to advance the debate.

I Think Paul justs wants to be the last poster.

I agree with your sentiments about the thread, as one who has not studied all the literature mentioned I found it interesting but feel that there is a fundamental flaw to some of the arguments.

There will never be any prove of a God unless He shows Himself, however no matter what science shows or proves will not disprove the possibility of a God as the hand of a God may still be behind the big bang, evolution or whatever, infact it will never be possible to disprove the existence of a God, but I like everybody else do not know if one or more exist, or it is just a fantasy or hope born out of Faith, frustration ,desperation or just a need.

Brian

 

[dan-cat]

What they didn't tell us was, that he thought he was Jesus and could fly, he fell in the garden from the 3 floor.

True

I guess in his delusional state he forgot the teachings of the gospel. Matthew Chapter 4.

 

[Pauldohert]

I have seen God!

 

[Pauldohert]

I guess in his delusional state he forgot the teachings of the gospel. Matthew Chapter 4.

Not knowing what they are I shall take your word for it.

 

[dan-cat]

I agree with your sentiments about the thread, as one who has not studied all the literature mentioned I found it interesting but feel that there is a fundamental flaw to some of the arguments.

I for one have really enjoyed it.

 

[Pauldohert]

I really have.

 

[Brianwarnock]

I really have.

Look I know Torres is good but he is just a gifted footballer.

Brian

 

[Pauldohert]

Look I know Torres is good but he is just a gifted footballer.

Brian

I knew that would be on your mind! Enjoy the game.

 

[Pauldohert]

I can tell you how to see him for yourself!